[Coco] Re: 8" drive to 5.25" replacement?

Richard E. Crislip rcrislip at neo.rr.com
Sat Dec 6 15:22:00 EST 2003


Hello Gene

Hey thanks for the response, the router nat idea is something I need to look
into. I'm using a NetGear 311 router. It's old by today's standards, but
for me at least, it's a goodie. I'll look at your response in more depth to
see what else I can gleem from it and if we want to converse further we'll
take this to the Amithlon list and off this one. 

On 12/06/03, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Saturday 06 December 2003 09:21, Richard E. Crislip wrote:
>> Hello Gene
>> 
>> Hehe.. But it sure does work good on my A4000 still today. 8-) I
>> just wish I could figure out way my Amithlon setup refuses to
>> connect to the internet. It sees my router just fine via telnat,
>> but I have not been able to go any further. No problems with the
>> real Amiga or my two PCs (Winblows or Linux) doing it though
>> <sigh>. I need to get my business off that poor old 13 year old
>> hardware.
> 
> Yeah, but it works so nice.  As to the router, it probably hasn't been 
> told to NAT the amigas address.  Not knowing what router, I can't 
> advise.  And I don't do that much multiple address NATing in mine 
> either as I'm using iptables on the older linux box for that.  My 
> path to the router from here is via a nic using a 192.168.xx.xx 
> address, then through iptables to the second nic in the old machine, 
> with iptables doing the NATing between the 192.168.xx.xx address of 
> nic #2 to nic#1 at 192.168.yy.yy.  Then the router NATs the 
> 192.168.yy.yy address to whatever the PPPoE in the router obtains via 
> DHCP for my real DSL address.  Absolutely transparent from this end, 
> absolutely opaque from the other end.
> 
> Needless to say, with that much state controlled NATing going on, even 
> the older machine with all its active firewall rules, has only logged 
> one attack attempt, and that one came in thru a previous router, a 
> Seimans, that the hacker destroyed 2 weeks after I installed it,  But 
> the linksys I replaced it with has never even let a SYN packet thru.
> 
> Funny thing though, the attack actually came from a verizon DNS server 
> according to the logs I captured.  I'd bet they were running an old 
> version of bind, and got rootkitted.
> 
> As far as I know, I'm invisible to the outside world.  Run the linux 
> 'nmap' scanner against my current 151.205.10.15 real address and see 
> if you can find me.  I'll try to plug any holes you can find.
> 
> Cheers, Gene
> AMD K6-III at 500mhz 320M
> Athlon1600XP at 1400mhz  512M
> 99.22% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
> Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message
> by Gene Heskett are:
> Copyright 2003 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
> 
> 
Regards
-- 
Cruisen                                                         _|_
              on AutoPilot with an Amiga   ---o-( )-o---   and a CoCo
 
                                             Richard




More information about the Coco mailing list