[arg_discuss] ARG SIG in 2007

James Jones james at virtualrealmsoftware.com
Tue Jan 2 06:01:12 EST 2007


I vote for IRC as well. I help run an IRC network and I am sure I could get
something arranged.

-----Original Message-----
From: arg_discuss-bounces at igda.org [mailto:arg_discuss-bounces at igda.org] On
Behalf Of Paul Williams
Sent: Tuesday, 2 January 2007 11:41 p.m.
To: Discussion list of the IGDA ARG SIG
Subject: Re: [arg_discuss] ARG SIG in 2007

Being the IRC nerd I am I also "vote" for IRC. I have experience (and
also run my own IRC network) in getting things like webchats, logging,
inter-channel connections and whatnot setup. Most corporate firewalls
don't block packets, like you mention, but rather just the common ports
(6667, 6697, etc etc). A CGI:IRC program should be able to solve any
issues regarding not being able to access through a corporate firewall,
or even just a random port number being opened for client connections.

But this is all off-topic ;)

Being quite new to the SIG has left me somewhat on the outside of
things. I'm not a puppetmaster. I've only played (am playing) one ARG,
that is considered to be out of the ordinary for most ARGs. However, I
am all for getting involved in the development of ARGs - which is
probably why I haven't unsubscribed from this list yet. I'll be at the
chat to lend whatever it is I can to it. :-)

~ Paul Williams

Adam Martin wrote:

> On 31/12/06, Gupfee <gupfee at gmail.com> wrote:

>

>> I would prefer an IRC chat, myself. Telechat has several problems

>>

>

> Sorry for the confusion, but Skype was cited only for the

> chatroom-based messaging system part, not the voice part. Most of the

> IM systems these days have all the same features, Skype isn't really

> anything special, just a free cross-platform one that happens to be

> particularly good at punching through firewalls (e.g. the last place I

> worked blocked all outgoing and incomnig IRC traffic through

> packet-inspection, but skype went through fine - they had a corporate

> policy of not allowing any IRC in particular).

>

>

>> Can you tell I'm a fan of IRC? :) I know there are many of us who are

>> channel operators on chat-solutions.org, where most ARG-related chat

>> happens these days anyways, so if you want any help setting up a

>> channel or the like, please let me know. I'd be happy to help.

>>

>

> Thanks, if everyone's happy with IRC that would be great.

>

> Adam

> _______________________________________________

> ARG_Discuss mailing list

> ARG_Discuss at igda.org

> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/arg_discuss

>

>


_______________________________________________
ARG_Discuss mailing list
ARG_Discuss at igda.org
http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/arg_discuss


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.2/613 - Release Date: 1/01/2007
2:50 p.m.


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.2/613 - Release Date: 1/01/2007
2:50 p.m.




More information about the ARG_Discuss mailing list