[arg_discuss] Admission criteria for private sub-list

[Adam Martin]

>From the chat logs, there was general interest in a private sub-list

of the SIG specifically for people to discuss and share things they
didn't want to:

 - show up on Google searches
 - be available to players in the normal course of a game
 - (anything else?)

People cited examples for several different aspects of development, e.g.:

 - peer-review on proposed plot-twists / writing
 - OOC post-mortem discussion of a game event whilst the game itself
was still running
 - non-archived thoughts and questions (less need to worry about the
exact words used because they aren't going to be quoted back at you in
the future)
 - academic discussions
 - (anything else?)

But for this to go ahead we'd need to decide admission criteria.
Please could everyone reply to this with ideas / thoughts / etc - if
you don't, we won't be able to move ahead at all :). If you've ever
not spoken up because of worries over the publicness of this list,
please especially help out now.

There are also objections to the idea itself, which we should discuss
here (or we can wait until we have some basic criteria worked out and
re-assess how the scheme will work).

Adam