[Coco] **JUNK** Re: 2022-06-10 Update on my CoCoIOn Ethernet Card Project

[rick ulland]

 > Has anyone ever made or even considered a serial pack using the 16550?

This product still has the empty pads for a 16550, that's why it was 
'CoCoIO' and not 'CoCoNet' or something. Still can't get the dang chip 
placed, but there are onesies. There are 16550 drivers well in the 
works, and the chip does exist in the Megi-Mini MPI. So quite a few 
folks agree with you, it would be a good fit.

-rick


On 6/11/2022 8:32 AM, Bill Gunshannon via Coco wrote:
> On 6/10/22 15:52, Michael Furman via Coco wrote:
>> I ended last week’s post with a riddle:
>>
>> My CoCo needs to know what time it is and it can send and receive UDP 
>> packets.
>>
>> The Answer: We don’t need no steenkin’ Real-Time Clocks! Introducing: 
>> NTP on the CoCo
>>
>> YouTube Video 1: NTP on the CoCo
>> https://youtu.be/eu2x6OmREF0
>>
>> YouTube Video 2: Demonstration of the CoCOIOn Ethernet Card on a CoCo 2
>> https://youtu.be/utCqwvolmEY
>>
>> I wrote an ntpdate application for the CoCo that works with the 
>> CoCoIOn Ethernet Card.  After the card is initialized with ccio -i 
>> you can run ntpdate to set the system time.
>>
>> GitHub:
>> https://github.com/n6il/cocoio-dw/releases/tag/20220610
>> https://github.com/n6il/cocoio-dw/tree/main/tests
>>
>> Hardware From:
>> Computer Conect
>> https://computerconect.com
>>
>> https://youtu.be/eu2x6OmREF0
>>
>
> This real time clock stuff reminded me of the work I did using a
> GPS receiver as a clock source for various Unix machines.  The
> same could easily be don for the COCO except for the limited
> number of available serial ports.
>
> So, now the question.  Has anyone ever made or even considered
> a serial pack using the 16550?  It offers speed and efficiency
> and could probably be made addressable so that one could put a
> number of them (well, a couple) on a COCO allowing for even more
> fast serial connections with lower CPU overhead.  Seems like it
> would be nice for DriveWire.  Hmm...  Now that I think of it,
> you could probably make a board with more than one and add a
> bunch of serial ports.
>
> Any serious flaws in this thinking?
>
> bill
>
>