[Coco] [Color Computer] Copyrights

[Arthur Flexser]

Perhaps it is I that owes an apology;  now that I think about it, I'm not 100%
sure what Steve's intent was, once the 'legal blocks' were removed, and I no
longer have the original message to reread.  I may have simply assumed his
intent was free release of the stuff, since it is hard for me to imagine that
selling it at this late date wouldn't be more bother than it is worth.

Art

On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Charlie wrote:

> 
> "Arthur Flexser" <flexser at fiu.edu> wrote in message 
> news:Pine.SOL.4.21.0809242314210.2153-100000 at solix.fiu.edu...
> > Had you actually read Steve's post that you are ranting about, you would 
> > know
> > that it was about removing legal blocks to his releasing it to the public,
> > which he wants to do.
> >
> > Art
> 
> My understanding is that removing the "legal blocks" is so he can sell his 
> software.
> I must admit to not caring to find out anymore past that, as I think my 
> feelings are clear on the subject.
> (and will continue to be) This is very much different than allowing coco 
> users to share software after 30 years of being out of retail.
> I don't buy all that it was always available crap. His post simply says 
> doing something with his software publicly.
> 
> If Steve makes his software freely available to coco users, or I simply am 
> misinformed since last I got information on the subject,  I will say many 
> many times I'm sorry. As of right now, as far as I know that's not what the 
> deal is.
> 
> So, reading his post (and I did) actually has nothing to do with what I 
> said.
> 
> Charlie
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>