[Coco] This tickles me.... Update!.. It ain't so bad...

[George Ramsower]

 If you haven't read my previous post, please read the quoted part first.
-------------

 I took the little time it takes to figure this...

 I  checked the count at  this month's messages at 346. Then I deleted all 
the BS that was NOT coco related and the result was 258 messages.

 That's only 88 messages! ( My decision on that). I'm probably not exactly 
in-tune with everyone on that. I did delete all messages that I was involved 
wiith, just to be sure I had no bias in this simple test.

 I suppose this isn't as bad as it appeared at first, because the related 
massages aren't as loud as the BS... if you choose to read the BS.

 I don't, usually. However, 88 BS messages out of 346 results in about one 
in four messages that we could do without.

 It ain't so bad.

George


> I'm amused at what sometimes happens here on the Coco list.
>
> When we begin talking about topics not directly related to COCOS this list 
> sometimes develops some differences of opinions and escelates into some 
> sour notes being exchanged.
>  It is normal for folks to have disagreements on topics. However, this 
> shouldn't happen on this Coco list because, most always, the topics aren't 
> even Coco topics.
>
> I'm fairly sure this stuff wouldn't happen as often if we could keep the 
> subjects in line with the directive of this list group.
>
> It's difficult to argue about how we go about working with a Coco. All the 
> arguments have been discussed for many years and are finally settled.
>
> Linux, Microsoft, Apple, IBM, Ford and Chevy and the weather have nothing 
> to do with this list. Not even politics and the economy have anything to 
> do with this list.
>
> What tickles me is when someone says "Shut UP, already!" yhen, suddenly 
> there is almost no traffic at all. This implies that there is too much 
> traffic on OFF TOPIC discussions on the Coco listgroup..
>
> Personally, I wasn't even following the last topic that resulted in sour 
> notes until just out of curiosity, I opened one of the last messages in 
> that discussion to find that folks were exchanging very clever blows at 
> each other. It's sad but, I was impressed how the verbiage was well 
> designed.
>
> Perhaps we could improve this listgroup if we worked dilligently at trying 
> to keep it directly related to a Coco.
>
> I betcha that whatever off topic discussion we get into has a listgroup on 
> that topic somewhere else, having the same debate.
>
> I would think it wouldn't be too difficult to find that listgroup, join up 
> and carry on there.
>
> Whucha say? Can we work on this?
>
>
> George
>