[Coco] ?PEEK(&HFF90) RETURNS 126 ON MY UNUPGRADED 26-3124?

[Mark Marlette]

Rob,

Sent an Email last Thursday.

Your order shipped then.

Thanks,

Mark

At 4/23/2007 12:43 AM, you wrote:

>No, I didn't use the same CoCo. When I just received the 3124, the coco
>3 i had tested the 3024,s with was in the storage building (i am
>finishing up my new residence and the entire home i am living in now
>will be one big coco playroom - after i tear out the partitions, and
>shelve every wall :-) The coco i tested the 3124 with was one of the
>later model coco 3's that came in the spiffy blue box rather than the
>red lettered box. The 3124's tamper proof seal had been peeled off and
>stuck beside the screw it once covered so i thought it was upgraded,
>but upon opening it there were no apparent mods. I am sure tandy never
>produced a coco 3 compatible mpi, only upgraded existing ones, which
>really wouldn't be evident on the 3024's, but the 3124 should have had
>a sat board or piggybacked chip if it had been upgraded. I will test it
>with another coco 3 tomorrow.
>
>I have sent the money for an upgrade pal for a 3024 via paypal. The
>reason I asked you if it had cleared was because I USED THE WRONG
>ROUTING NUMBER. I checked with paypal and they paid it anyway and took
>it from one of my credit cards, thankfully (I was worried you might
>think I was trying to scam ya') :-)
>
>Thanks for all the wonderful work that you do - rob
>
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: Re: [Coco] ?PEEK(&HFF90) RETURNS 126 ON MY UNUPGRADED 26-3124?
> > From: Mark Marlette <mark at cloud9tech.com>
> > Date: Sun, April 22, 2007 6:53 pm
> > To: CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts <coco at maltedmedia.com>
> >
> > Robert, What GIME is in your CoCo? Test performed on the same CoCo?
> > I'm sure I have done this test on both MPIs. Been too long ago.
> > Thanks, Mark At 4/21/2007 02:12 PM, you wrote: >Marks test of
> > ?peek(&hff90) returns 255 on all of my 3024 multi-paks, >however it
> > returned 126 on my 3124. I opened the 3124 and there is no >satellite
> > board nor any piggy backed chips nor any mod of any kind - i >can't
> > see that this pak has been upgraded. Does this test only work for >the
> > 3024's? thanks - Rob > >p.s. - Mark - has my paypal payment cleared
> > for the pal chip 3024 >upgrade? thanks - robert > > >-- >Coco mailing
> > list >Coco at maltedmedia.com
> > >http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco > > > > >-- >No virus
> > found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > >Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.5.9/773 - Release Date:
> > >4/22/2007 8:18 PM<hr>No virus found in this outgoing message. 
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.5.9/773 - Release Date:
> > 4/22/2007 8:18 PM<hr>-- Coco mailing list Coco at maltedmedia.com
> > http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>
>
>--
>Coco mailing list
>Coco at maltedmedia.com
>http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.463 / Virus Database: 269.5.9/773 - Release Date: 
>4/22/2007 8:18 PM
-------------- next part --------------


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.463 / Virus Database: 269.5.9/773 - Release Date: 4/22/2007 8:18 PM