[Coco] GIME Chip Registers and the ultimate repack

[Kevin Diggs]

Hi,

	Any thoughts about cutting the page size? In my opinion, 8k for a 64k
workspace is ... ridiculous. This would not change the external pins,
right?

	Will you be making the code public? I would like to learn from what
you are doing so I can do the 6909.

					kevin

P.S.:	I don't get all this repacking? One of the things I like about
	the cocos are the new cases (i.e. did not like the uni case).
	I think they are kinda sleek looking.

jdaggett at gate.net wrote:
> 
> hello
> 
> After seeing a few repacks of COCO3's I started mulling over an idea of repacking
> and modernizing the coco a bit. I have started coding some VHDL code to do the
> GIME chip in an FPGA. So far the MMU is coded and syntesized and directly
> addresses 2  megs of ram. The datram is a 16x8 and not the 16x6 currently used.
> Looks like the MMU can run at 40 MHz with no problem.  The plan is to use fast
> SRAM for my repack. 512Kx8 20nS SRAM are relatively cheap, under $10 each.
> 512Kx8 70nS SRAMs are under $5.
> 
> After reading the Unraveled Series and studying the service manual I have basically
> one area of concern. That is the INIT0 register located at $FF90. From what I gather
> on cold restart or power up, after coming out of reset it appears that the GIME chip
> is set with the MMU off and in COCO 3 mode. RSBAsic initializes the INIT0 register
> and then programs the task registers at $FFA0 to $FFAF with proper vlaues.
> 
> What I contend to do is to come out of reset and have the INIT0 register default to
> $4E. That is:
>   bit 7 - "0"
>   bit 6 - "0"
>   bit 5 - "1"
>   bit 4 - "1"
>   bit 3 - "1"
>   bit 2 - "1"
>   bit 1 - "1"
>   bit 0 - "0"
> 
> I think this will still be compatible with the RS Basic rom? Anyone sure of this?
> 
> I have to finish up coding the register stack to at least $FF97. I have planned usage
> for $FF96 and $FF97 to drive an external clock chip to generate various CPU bus
> speeds separate from the video clock. After that it will be on to the video section.
> 
> Thinking of putting a RTC at $FF80 to $FF8F also.
> 
> Mind boggling as to what one can do with these FPGAs.
> 
> james
> 
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco