[Coco] Ham Radio

john donaldson jadonaldson at charter.net
Tue Nov 11 11:14:00 EST 2003


James,
    Some of us are now using standard off the shelf 
wireless
Internet Routers for this. The standard system has dip
switchs that allow you to select the frequency the unit
works on. Some of these are in the 2400 MHZ Amateur Band.
    A couple of friends of mine has added a 10W 2400 MHZ 
amp
to one and can connect over a 10 mile path using 22 
element
beams. At 2400 MHZ beams are real small.

John Donaldson
AB8YZ
  
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 18:53:25 -0500
  jdaggett at gate.net wrote:
>John
>
>I downloaded the APRS protocol document and looked at it. 
>It appears that APRS 
>uses only the AX.25 UI frame. It appears that only 1200 
>baud is supported, maybe 
>2400, for VHF/UHF. It is a tight squeeze to get 9600 baud 
>in a VHF channel width of 
>15KHz. The AX.25 UI frame is a max of 332 bytes and 
>interesting that the color 
>pallette for the map symbols is 16 colors! 
>
>I think if you tried to have the OS9 do the TNC functions 
>along with 
>decoding/encoding UI frame along with display functions 
>maybe a bit to much. Then 
>there is the einterface to the GPS receiver!I think it 
>will be enough to handle the UI 
>frame and then dice that up and process that data. The 
>way the Lat/Long data is 
>encoded and decoded is strange. Factoring by 91^2 then 
>91^2, then 91^1 is a bit 
>strange but then it becomes obvious that the person 
>behind the creation of APRS, 
>WA4APR, is an ex military personnel. Often the term 
>Tactical location appears.  
>
>Personally I think that APRS is an overkill for general 
>traffic. I can see where it can 
>catch on though. With all the different packet switches 
>and the meriad of 
>&^^&%$tors that have proliferated amature radio, APRS is 
>considerably simpler. AN 
>old 286 computer, a 1200 baud TNC and a VHF radio and 
>away you go. Know worry 
>as to how to configure the TNC for this mode or that mode 
>or this and that protocol. 
>I can see the usages for emergency communications and 
>public service. But using it 
>to surf or acess the Internet from a VHF radio at 1200 
>Baud is a bit slow by modern 
>standards. 
>
>james 
>
>wa4bzj
>  
>
>On 10 Nov 2003 at 13:07, john donaldson wrote:
>
>>    Now APRS seems to have taker over from Packet. When I 
>> lived in Houston, Texas most of the packet networks had 
>> very
>> little activity, but the APRS network was very busy and 
>> growing.
>>    I wonder if APRS could be programed to run on a COCO3
>> under OS9 or NitrOS9??
>> 
>> John Donaldson
>> AB8YZ
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:52:17 -0500
>>   jdaggett at gate.net wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >That is KA9Q software. 
>> >
>> >The last itme I used packet here in So. Fla it was a 
>> >mess. About 8 yrs ago. Half the 
>> >state was Rose, (northern part) and the other, 
>>(southern 
>> >part) was Net One. just to 
>> >get a connection from Ft. Lauderdale to Jacksonville 
>> >required the right phase of the 
>> >moon. Jupiter needed to be in Sagitarius and the wind 
>>had 
>> >to be out of the south. 
>> >Then you might have the connection for about an hour 
>> >before some link in the 
>> >middle failed. Typical hop was Ft. Lauderdale to Ft. 
>> >Myers, to Sarasota, to 
>> >Aracadia, to Orlando,  to Ocala, to Palatka, then to 
>> >Jacksonvile. The link from 
>> >Arcadia to Orlando was the weakest one. At 430 Mhz it 
>>had 
>> >the longest haul. Using 
>> >400Mhz around the east central part of the state is 
>> >limited. Cape Kennedy and 
>> >Patrick AFB restricted radiated power. Essentially 
>>there 
>> >was a wall in central 
>> >Florida, Considerig MacDill AFB in Tampa, McCoy NAS in 
>> >Orlando and the Cape 
>> >on the east coast.. McCoy is gone now and McDill AFB 
>>has 
>> >reduced importance so 
>> >that should have freed up a lane to the north.  
>> >
>> >One of these days I may just check again to see if the 
>> >service is more reliable and 
>> >better performance. 
>> >
>> >james
>> >
>> >WA4BZJ      
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >On 10 Nov 2003 at 8:48, john donaldson wrote:
>> >
>> >>    I used to run KN9Q (sp) on my MM/1 and had a ball 
>> >> talking
>> >> to other hams using it and watching traffic over the 
>> >> packet
>> >> network.
>> >> 
>> >> John Donaldson
>> >> AB8YZ
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 22:15:32 -0800
>> >>   <jimcox at miba51.com> wrote:
>> >> >John:
>> >> >
>> >> >Drop me a line some time, I'd like to learn more 
>>about 
>> >> >packet radio.
>> >> >
>> >> >Jim
>> >> >
>> >> >On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 17:12:55 -0800
>> >> >  "John Guin" <johnguin at hotmaill.com> wrote:
>> >> >>Hello all,
>> >> >>
>> >> >>I was reading Jim Cox's mail about not pursuing ham 
>> >>radio 
>> >> >>work with the Coco
>> >> >>in the Seattle/Bellevue area.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>I'm also a ham radio operator in the Seattle area, 
>>and 
>> >> >>have had antenna
>> >> >>restrictions to deal with as well.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>Back when I had my packet radio set up, I used a 
>>19" 
>> >>long 
>> >> >>antenna made from
>> >> >>#12 wire and got reception and transmission good 
>> >>enough 
>> >> >>from West Seattle to
>> >> >>the node closest to my condo - about 3 miles away. 
>> I 
>> >> >>used my old 2 meter
>> >> >>handheld, and it worked very well.  It only had one 
>> >>watt 
>> >> >>of transmitting
>> >> >>power.  That's all you need to get started on 
>>packet
>> >> >>
>> >> >>IIRC, there was actually a packet article or two in 
>> >>the 
>> >> >>Rainbow, but I'm not
>> >> >>sure how useful the information would be.  The 
>>packet 
>> >> >>modem does most of the
>> >> >>work, though, so the easiest thing to do with a 
>>Coco 
>> >>now 
>> >> >>would be to use a
>> >> >>terminal program to log data.  Since the Coco uses 
>>a 
>> >> >>standard voltage on the
>> >> >>serial port, it is not as hard to connect the modem 
>>as 
>> >> >>some other 8 bit
>> >> >>machines (Commodore, I'm talking to you).
>> >> >>
>> >> >>Anyway, the point of this letter is not to let 
>>antenna 
>> >> >>restrictions keep you
>> >> >>off the air.  Unless you were wanting to get 
>>involved 
>> >> >>with Clover or some of
>> >> >>the other low frequency modes, a really cheap "coat 
>> >> >>hanger" antenna sitting
>> >> >>in a window is all you really need.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>73,
>> >> >>John Guin
>> >> >>KB7ZJW
>> >> >>
>> >> >>-- 

>> >> >>Coco mailing list
>> >> >>Coco at maltedmedia.com
>> >> >>http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >-- 
>> >> >Coco mailing list
>> >> >Coco at maltedmedia.com
>> >> >http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>> >> 
>> >> <TEXTAREA NAME="Signature" ROWS="4" COLS="60">
>> >> 
>> >> -- 
>> >> Coco mailing list
>> >> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>> >> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >-- 
>> >Coco mailing list
>> >Coco at maltedmedia.com
>> >http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>> 
>> <TEXTAREA NAME="Signature" ROWS="4" COLS="60">
>> 
>> -- 
>> Coco mailing list
>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>
>

<TEXTAREA NAME="Signature" ROWS="4" COLS="60">



More information about the Coco mailing list