[arg_discuss] English Gargoyle ARG?

[Andrea Phillips]

...I'm sitting quietly here hoping this conversation will turn into a
nice SIG consensus on what an ARG is that I can put into the press
kit... shh, don't tell anybody...

On 10/3/07, Bryan Alexander <Bryan.Alexander at nitle.org> wrote:

> At first blush, I'm tempted to say that locative art doesn't require a narrative, while ARGs do.

>

> But I can readily imagine making a narrative by moving between these sculptures, say.

>

> so the narrative would have to be intentional on the creators' part.

>

> Sorry to be telegraphic - trying to multitask IM meetings, email, and drywall -

>

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: arg_discuss-bounces at igda.org on behalf of despain at quantumcontent.com

> Sent: Wed 10/3/2007 3:44 PM

> To: Discussion list of the IGDA ARG SIG

> Subject: Re: [arg_discuss] English Gargoyle ARG?

>

> > Would this better be considered chaotic fiction?  I don't recall if we've

> > gone over that idea here.

> >

> > Or locative art?

>

> It sounds to me like chaotic fiction requires a clear narrative, although

> I may be misunderstanding the term.

>

> Locative art? Sure. But when is something locative art, and when is it an

> arg? how do you tell the difference? Is some locative art also an arg?

>

> Wendy Despain

> quantumcontent.com

>

> _______________________________________________

> ARG_Discuss mailing list

> ARG_Discuss at igda.org

> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/arg_discuss

> _______________________________________________

> ARG_Discuss mailing list

> ARG_Discuss at igda.org

> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/arg_discuss

>



-- 
Andrea Phillips
andrhia at gmail.com
http://www.deusexmachinatio.com
Words * Marketing * Interaction