Fwd: Reply-All / Reply-To-List RE: [Mastering-perl] Re: Welcome to the "Mastering-perl" mailing list

[Shawn Carroll]

Drat it, I didn't hit reply-all and sent this only to Bill.  Meant it
for the whole list

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Shawn Carroll <shawn.c.carroll at gmail.com>
Date: Jan 5, 2006 3:28 PM
Subject: Re: Reply-All / Reply-To-List RE: [Mastering-perl] Re:
Welcome to the "Mastering-perl" mailing list
To: "Ricker, William" <William.Ricker at fmr.com>


It's a list, have the setting munge the reply-to back to the list.  It
is the expected behavour of mailing lists such as this.

And please, no-one bring up the evils of munging the reply-to header screed.

--Shawn

On 1/5/06, Ricker, William <William.Ricker at fmr.com> wrote:
> >> Bill Riker sent me a message off list (and a lot of people have been
>          ^c
>
> >> doing that, which is fine I guess, but harder to share with everyone
> >> else who might have something to add)
>
> > You may want to set the "reply-to" to the list rather than the sender
> if
> > you really want to encourage on-list discussion.
>
> Yes, if Reply-to-list is the desired behavior, setting that can be done.
>
> However, it results in embarrassment regularly on the lists that use it.
> As long as Reply-All hits the group, as it does with this list now, it's
> a workable compromise.
>
> -- Bill
> _______________________________________________
> Mastering-perl mailing list
> Mastering-perl at theperlreview.com
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/mastering-perl
>


--
shawn.c.carroll at gmail.com
Perl Programmer
Soccer Referee


--
shawn.c.carroll at gmail.com
Perl Programmer
Soccer Referee