[LSC] Call for Votes: Second Try: File Format Restrictions for Official Parts

[Travis Cobbs]

I vote YES.

--Travis Cobbs

On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Travis Cobbs <tcobbs at gmail.com> wrote:


> Based on Michael's complaints, I have updated the last section of the

> document.  The link is of course the same, but this vote is for the updated

> version.

>

> This is a call for votes to ratify the following document:

>

> http://www.ldraw.org/Article408.html

>

> Please note: it is known that this document is incomplete.  I feel that it

> would be better to have the incomplete document ratified now, and then add

> things to it in the future, than to continue indefinitely with no official

> document.  All future changes will have to be ratified, but that doesn't

> prevent us from leaving the ratified version of the document in the scratch

> pad for future edits, so that multiple changes can be ratified at once.

>

> It is important to note that the items that are missing should all be more

> restrictions, not exceptions to the given rules.  If anyone knows of any

> exceptions to the rules in the document, please speak up.

>

> --Travis

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://five.pairlist.net/pipermail/lsc/attachments/20080520/d8df37a2/attachment.htm>