[LSC] Parts+stickers

[Travis Cobbs]

Why should having a part with a sticker pre-applied be different from a
shortcut, as far as being suitable for inclusion in the official library?  I
do feel that it should have a special naming convention, but I don't
understand why it should be disallowed.  It seems to me that if it makes
sense to have a shortcut for the entire Power Functions IR remote control,
for example, it makes just as much sense to have a shortcut for a solar
panel with sticker applied (also, for example).  Why should one be allowed,
but not the other?  Why shouldn't we allow pre-stickered versions of the
following parts?

http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?s=891
http://www.peeron.com/inv/parts/30034

--Travis

On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Michael Heidemann <mikeheide at web.de> wrote:


> I agree with Philo. We should not put these into the library by standard.

>

> cu

> mikeheide

>

> Philo schrieb:

>

>  Any opinions about Joshua note?

>> http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/4448c01.dat

>>

>> My personal opinion is that it is a non-issue since we don't intend to

>> provide parts with stickers, only this one exists to maintain compatibility

>> with previous official libraries...

>>

>> Philo

>> _______________________________________________

>> LSC mailing list

>> LSC at ldraw.org

>> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc

>>

>>  _______________________________________________

> LSC mailing list

> LSC at ldraw.org

> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://five.pairlist.net/pipermail/lsc/attachments/20080515/f305233e/attachment.htm>