[LSC] Bad wording in Article 512

[Michael Heidemann]

Your suggestion sounds good to me. You are native english so it should 
be better ;-)

We have to wait now for the others to rise their vote.

I found this during my translation into german. If you do something like 
that you have to thought about everything for each sentence, for each word.

cu
mikeheide

Travis Cobbs schrieb:

> I think I see what you are complaining about, but I don't think what 

> you have is much better than the original text.  The following seems 

> more accurate to me:

>

> "For example, the first sticker/part shortcut created for part 

> 30185c01.dat would have a filename of 30185c01d01.dat."

>

> --Travis

>

> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Michael Heidemann <mikeheide at web.de 

> <mailto:mikeheide at web.de>> wrote:

>

>     The following sentence is taken from

>     http://www.ldraw.org/Article512.html and I think it is not correct

>     (section: sticker shortcuts).

>

>     "For example, the first sticker added to part 30185c01.dat would

>     have a filename of 30185c01d01.dat."

>

>     I think it should be like follows to be clear for everybody:

>

>     "For example, if the first sticker is added to part 30185c01.dat

>     the sticker shortcut would have the filename 30185c01d01.dat"

>

>     Please send your comments.

>

>     cu

>     mikeheide

>     _______________________________________________

>     LSC mailing list

>     LSC at ldraw.org <mailto:LSC at ldraw.org>

>     http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc

>

>

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

>

> _______________________________________________

> LSC mailing list

> LSC at ldraw.org

> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc

>