[LSC] Bad wording in Article 512

[Travis Cobbs]

I think I see what you are complaining about, but I don't think what you
have is much better than the original text.  The following seems more
accurate to me:

"For example, the first sticker/part shortcut created for part 30185c01.dat
would have a filename of 30185c01d01.dat."

--Travis

On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Michael Heidemann <mikeheide at web.de> wrote:


> The following sentence is taken from http://www.ldraw.org/Article512.htmland I think it is not correct (section: sticker shortcuts).

>

> "For example, the first sticker added to part 30185c01.dat would have a

> filename of 30185c01d01.dat."

>

> I think it should be like follows to be clear for everybody:

>

> "For example, if the first sticker is added to part 30185c01.dat the

> sticker shortcut would have the filename 30185c01d01.dat"

>

> Please send your comments.

>

> cu

> mikeheide

> _______________________________________________

> LSC mailing list

> LSC at ldraw.org

> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://five.pairlist.net/pipermail/lsc/attachments/20080630/833ea422/attachment.htm>