[LSC] Call for votes: LDraw File Format Specification 1.0- APPROVED

[William Howard]

Willy,

I think I got all the old links to the 0.27 spec and changed them to the 1.0 
spec so I don't think I need anything re-linking.  And just in case I missed 
any I added a note to the top of the 0.27 spec that it has been superceeded 
by the 1.0 spec.

Article 401 should definately have the official note, but, by it's very 
nature of being an unofficial list, 342 should not.

While harmonizing style is a good idea, it's something I personally don't 
have time to do at the moment.  It was with harmonizing style in mind that 
the word "material" was added to the note on the spec pages - as it leaves 
the webmasters/others free to change the style/layout of the official spec 
pages as the visuals of the site changes.

I also don't think the the specs/extns linked from the 1.0 spec need any 
text adding that they are part of the 1.0 spec.  They are meant to be 
stand-alone extensions so are validly part of the 0.27 spec and any future 
versions of the spec.

W

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "LDraw" <ldraw at holly-wood.it>
To: "LDraw Standards Committee" <lsc at ldraw.org>
Cc: "LDraw Webmaster" <webmaster at ldraw.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 11:02 AM
Subject: Re: [LSC] Call for votes: LDraw File Format Specification 1.0- 
APPROVED



> dear lsc,

>

> do you still need me to re-link something ? looking through the specs I 

> got the impression that the various articles should be formatted the same 

> harmonizing <hr /> <style> and <div> statements by taking the header 

> specs - http://www.ldraw.org/Article398.html for layout reference.

>

> furthermore I suggest that:

>

> http://www.ldraw.org/Article401.html

> http://www.ldraw.org/Article342.html

>

> carry your "Note: This document is an offical LSC specification and/or 

> lanaguage extension. Material changes can only be made after ratification 

> by the LSC. Ratified yyyy-mm-dd3"

>

> in addition all documents linked by:

>

> http://www.ldraw.org/Article218.html

>

> such as:

>

> http://www.ldraw.org/Article398.html

> http://www.ldraw.org/Article401.html

> http://www.ldraw.org/Article342.html

> http://www.ldraw.org/Article299.html

> http://www.ldraw.org/Article93.html

> http://www.ldraw.org/Article340.html

> http://www.ldraw.org/Article47.html

> http://www.ldraw.org/Article415.html

>

> should have a statement + link that they are part of the "File Format 

> 1.0.0"

>

> thoughts?

>

> w.

>

>

>

> William Howard schrieb:

>> With 4 votes for, 0 against and 1 (as yet) uncast, this proposal is 

>> approved

>>  Drinks all round everyone!

>>  I'll post on Lugnet tomorrow.

>>  Willy: I'll also need to change various links over to the new standard, 

>> so I may need some help editing pages if I don't have access to them

>>  W

>>

>>     ----- Original Message -----

>>     *From:* William Howard <mailto:william at howard-family.fsworld.co.uk>

>>     *To:* LDraw Standards Committee <mailto:lsc at ldraw.org>

>>     *Sent:* Thursday, September 20, 2007 9:52 AM

>>     *Subject:* [LSC] Call for votes: LDraw File Format Specification 1.0

>>

>>     No introduction/background should be necessary!

>>

>>      ------------Beginning of proposal----------

>>     That the LSC adopts the LDraw File Format standard as given at

>>     http://www.ldraw.org/Article218.html and publishes it as version 1.0

>>     of the specification.

>>     ---------------End of proposal--------------

>>

>>

>>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------

>>

>>     _______________________________________________

>>     LSC mailing list

>>     LSC at ldraw.org

>>     http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc

>>

>>

>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

>>

>> _______________________________________________

>> LSC mailing list

>> LSC at ldraw.org

>> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc

>

> _______________________________________________

> LSC mailing list

> LSC at ldraw.org

> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc

>