[LSC] File Format Restrictions for Official Parts
Michael Heidemann
mikeheide at web.de
Tue Nov 27 15:43:22 EST 2007
Attached please find a Dat file that I have used for some testing in LDDP.
The results are very curious.
As I am not familar with the new tool from Philo, maybe somebody can
make some tests with this file.
cu
mikeheide
Travis Cobbs schrieb:
> I meant to reply as well, and then forgot. The problem with both -det
> and -dist in L3P is that neither of those corresponds to an angle (at
> least based on my understanding). I believe that they're both
> influenced by the size of the polygons involved. If one of them does
> use normalized triangle surface normals (meaning that they aren't
> based on the triangle size), then .1 would probably mean about 26
> degrees, and .01 would probably mean about 8 degrees.
>
> --Travis
>
> On Nov 26, 2007 10:37 AM, Michael Heidemann <mikeheide at web.de
> <mailto:mikeheide at web.de>> wrote:
>
> I got no reply on this. Do my postings reach you?
>
> cu
> mikeheide
>
> Michael Heidemann schrieb:
> > Can somebody inform me about the angle according our new
> calculation
> > based on the old -det and -dist rules?
> >
> > I think we have had a good agreement over the past with the two
> values
> > of -det 0.01 and -dist 0.1.
> > If we had a line that just fulfill this values, what will be the
> angle
> > with our new calculation?
> > It should be a quad that is about 50 to 100 LDU square I think.
> >
> > I mention this, because I want to avoid that we are too restrictive
> > with our new rules.
> >
> > cu
> > mikeheide
> >
> > William Howard schrieb:
> >> I think what is interesting here is not the % of bad parts (which
> >> doesn't vary that much) but the huge jump in warped quads
> between 1
> >> and 2 degrees
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Philo" <philohome at free.fr
> <mailto:philohome at free.fr>>
> >> To: "LDraw Standards Committee" < lsc at ldraw.org
> <mailto:lsc at ldraw.org>>
> >> Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 8:13 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [LSC] File Format Restrictions for Official Parts
> >>
> >>
> >>> I modified Philo program to do this. Attached is the output
> for 1,
> >>> 2, and 3
> >>>
> >> Well done, Orion!
> >> Could you send me the modified program?
> >>
> >> So to sum up0: over 3018 official parts,
> >> at 3° we get 91 files in error with 1241 warped quads (3%)
> >> at 2° we get 112 files in error with 1836 warped quads (3.7%)
> >> at 1° we get 144 files in error with 5002 warped quads (4.7%)
> >>
> >> Before deciding the threshold, it would be interesting to check
> subparts
> >> that often contains the guts of the most complex parts, and
> primitives -
> >> 48/primitives, perhaps with a more stringent criteria.
> >>
> >>
> >> Philo
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> LSC mailing list
> >> LSC at ldraw.org <mailto:LSC at ldraw.org>
> >> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> LSC mailing list
> >> LSC at ldraw.org <mailto:LSC at ldraw.org>
> >> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc
> >>
> >
> _______________________________________________
> LSC mailing list
> LSC at ldraw.org <mailto:LSC at ldraw.org>
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> LSC mailing list
> LSC at ldraw.org
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://five.pairlist.net/pipermail/lsc/attachments/20071127/8363db14/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: det-test.dat
Url: <http://five.pairlist.net/pipermail/lsc/attachments/20071127/8363db14/attachment.ksh>
More information about the LSC
mailing list