[LSC] File Format Restrictions for Official Parts

Michael Heidemann mikeheide at web.de
Mon Nov 26 13:37:30 EST 2007


I got no reply on this. Do my postings reach you?

cu
mikeheide

Michael Heidemann schrieb:

> Can somebody inform me about the angle according our new calculation

> based on the old -det and -dist rules?

>

> I think we have had a good agreement over the past with the two values

> of -det 0.01 and -dist 0.1.

> If we had a line that just fulfill this values, what will be the angle

> with our new calculation?

> It should be a quad that is about 50 to 100 LDU square I think.

>

> I mention this, because I want to avoid that we are too restrictive

> with our new rules.

>

> cu

> mikeheide

>

> William Howard schrieb:

>> I think what is interesting here is not the % of bad parts (which

>> doesn't vary that much) but the huge jump in warped quads between 1

>> and 2 degrees

>>

>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Philo" <philohome at free.fr>

>> To: "LDraw Standards Committee" <lsc at ldraw.org>

>> Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 8:13 AM

>> Subject: Re: [LSC] File Format Restrictions for Official Parts

>>

>>

>>> I modified Philo program to do this. Attached is the output for 1,

>>> 2, and 3

>>>

>> Well done, Orion!

>> Could you send me the modified program?

>>

>> So to sum up0: over 3018 official parts,

>> at 3° we get 91 files in error with 1241 warped quads (3%)

>> at 2° we get 112 files in error with 1836 warped quads (3.7%)

>> at 1° we get 144 files in error with 5002 warped quads (4.7%)

>>

>> Before deciding the threshold, it would be interesting to check subparts

>> that often contains the guts of the most complex parts, and primitives -

>> 48/primitives, perhaps with a more stringent criteria.

>>

>>

>> Philo

>>

>> _______________________________________________

>> LSC mailing list

>> LSC at ldraw.org

>> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc

>>

>>

>> _______________________________________________

>> LSC mailing list

>> LSC at ldraw.org

>> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc

>>

>



More information about the LSC mailing list