[LSC] File Format Restrictions for Official Parts

[Ross Crawford]

Hi guys, apparently I am still on the list, which I don't mind because 
it's good to keep up with whats going on :) But feel free to remove me 
if you'd prefer to.

Anyway, I just wanted to post here to see if I still have posting 
permission, and to comment on this part:

1. On my connectors the lines do not coincide, and the angle is sharp 
enough to go with a type 2 in both cases (The 2 & 3 planes look about 
parallel to the 4 plane).
2. Even in your version, the area is so small, and it's a concave angle, 
even though the plugs all seem to be transparent (so far), I would not 
bother to make this a conditional because seeing it will be very rare 
indeed. If the curve is smooth enough to only require a conditional, I 
would not have any line at all.

ROSCO

Philo wrote:

> 

>>

>> Can you explain what you did here, and why?  I don't understand based 

>> just on your picture. 

> Oh, sorry... I have updated the picture 

> http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/Philo/Misc/plug.png

> Here we have 2 quads in the same plane (2 & 3) separated by the central 

> part of the latch (4). These 3 quads meet quad 1 with a smooth junction 

> for 2/3, an abrupt one for 4. A single conditional line is enough 

> between 2/3 and 1 (in black on the image), and it is overlapped in the 

> middle part by a fixed line (red) that shows the angle between 4 and 1.

> 

> Philo - hoping to have been clear ;o)

> 

> _______________________________________________

> LSC mailing list

> LSC at ldraw.org

> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc

>