[LSC] File Format Restrictions for Official Parts
William Howard
william at howard-family.fsworld.co.uk
Fri Nov 16 13:33:39 EST 2007
The part I have in mind has been officially released and then returned to
the PT for BFCing
When I asked about removing the pov-ray code during the BFCing process I was
told (by Steve) that it should stay
So we seem to have a major difference of opinion about "grand-father" rights
of parts.
Personally I think a part on the tracker should conform to new standards (so
I'm of the same opinion as Orion), but have been told otherwise (by Steve)
W
----- Original Message -----
From: "Orion Pobursky" <orion at ldraw.org>
To: "LDraw Standards Committee" <lsc at ldraw.org>
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 6:08 PM
Subject: Re: [LSC] File Format Restrictions for Official Parts
> William Howard wrote:
>>> William Howard wrote:
>>>> The official stance is given here
>>>> http://www.ldraw.org/Article479.html - which only says that it is
>>>> undesirable and not forbidden.
>>>>
>>>> Old files do matter, as old files quite frequently come back onto the
>>>> tracker. Any parts library specification needs to allow for
>>>> pre-existing files that contain pov-ray code (one such part is the
>>>> skelton minifig head), so we need a clause which says that parts
>>>> already containing such statements are allowed to keep them, but new
>>>> parts are not allowed to include them. I shall add something to that
>>>> effect.
>>>
>>> My stance on already official files not conforming to our set
>>> restrictions is that they don't need to be fixed right away. However, if
>>> they rotate onto the PT for any reason then they need to been fixed.
>>>
>>> -Orion
>>>
>> Even if that means removing pov-ray code - which has been decided by the
>> PT Admins that it can (and should) stay?
>>
>> W
>
> Maybe we're talking about 2 different things here. I'm referring to parts
> that have already been officially released. Are you talking about parts
> that are certified but not released?
>
> Basically I see 2 different types of parts: Officially released parts and
> those on the PT. Are far as Parts Standards for Official Parts (or
> whatever we decide to call it) document is concerned, the only parts that
> apply are those currently on the PT or any future part submitted to the PT
> (this includes Officially Released parts that are submitted to the PT to
> be revised or fixed). In other words, I feel that if it's on the PT, then
> it need to conform to our standards, period. If it's not on the PT then
> it's OK until such time as it is on the PT.
>
> -Orion
>
> --
> We don't stop playing because we grow old;
> we grow old because we stop playing
> -George Bernard Shaw
> _______________________________________________
> LSC mailing list
> LSC at ldraw.org
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc
>
More information about the LSC
mailing list