[LSC] File Format Restrictions for Official Parts

[Michael Heidemann]

I think that is not a very good idea, because we define a standard and 
have no tool to check this limitation.
Maybe someone can write a little tool that just do check for this 
standard, so we have a reference and hopefully the big progs like LDView 
will follow.

mikeheide

Travis Cobbs schrieb:

> We probably shouldn't put in an LDView coplanarity check when LDView 

> doesn't yet support this.  We could say that both possible 

> combinations of two triangles forming a quad must be co-planar to 

> within x degrees, and leave it up to future work to check this.

>

> --Travis

>

> On Nov 15, 2007 10:19 AM, Michael Heidemann <mikeheide at web.de 

> <mailto:mikeheide at web.de>> wrote:

>

>     I think it is now the time to put all changes we talked about into

>     the document on the scratch pad as there is:

>

>     -Meta commands section shorten, no explanaition on what that is

>     -Bullet list of allowed meta commands in the body

>     -Coplanarity check from LDView with a value 1 or 5 or whatever we

>     agree upon (The test procedure should be explained.)

>

>     Have I missed something?

>     mikeheide

>

>

>

>     Travis Cobbs schrieb:

>>     I convinced Sergio that keeping the connection info in separate

>>     files would be the way to go shortly after the info about his

>>     program was posted to LUGNET.  I don't think he's made the

>>     changes yet, but he said that he plans to.  (The changes aren't

>>     super-complicated, but neither are they trivial.)

>>

>>     Having said that, it appears that we have a general consensus

>>     that an itemized list would be better.

>>

>>     --Travis

>>

>>     On Nov 15, 2007 9:08 AM, Philo < philohome at free.fr

>>     <mailto:philohome at free.fr>> wrote:

>>

>>         > Personally, I would rather see connection information done

>>         as separate

>>         > files.  This allows author who don't want to implement

>>         clicking (i.e.

>>         > clicking a inappropriate for LDView) to not have to parse

>>         through the

>>         > click commands.  It also encourages data separation which

>>         would reduce

>>         > file complexity and confusion

>>         >

>>         You are right, that's the best solution. I'll suggest him

>>         when we get in

>>         touch...

>>

>>         Philo

>>         _______________________________________________

>>         LSC mailing list

>>         LSC at ldraw.org <mailto:LSC at ldraw.org>

>>         http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc

>>         <http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc>

>>

>>

>>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------

>>     _______________________________________________ LSC mailing list

>>     LSC at ldraw.org <mailto:LSC at ldraw.org>

>>     http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc

>

>     _______________________________________________

>     LSC mailing list

>     LSC at ldraw.org <mailto:LSC at ldraw.org>

>     http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc

>     <http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc>

>

>

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

>

> _______________________________________________

> LSC mailing list

> LSC at ldraw.org

> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc

>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://five.pairlist.net/pipermail/lsc/attachments/20071115/2bd7e09d/attachment.html>