[LSC] File Format Restrictions for Official Parts

[Travis Cobbs]

I convinced Sergio that keeping the connection info in separate files would
be the way to go shortly after the info about his program was posted to
LUGNET.  I don't think he's made the changes yet, but he said that he plans
to.  (The changes aren't super-complicated, but neither are they trivial.)

Having said that, it appears that we have a general consensus that an
itemized list would be better.

--Travis

On Nov 15, 2007 9:08 AM, Philo <philohome at free.fr> wrote:


> > Personally, I would rather see connection information done as separate

> > files.  This allows author who don't want to implement clicking (i.e.

> > clicking a inappropriate for LDView) to not have to parse through the

> > click commands.  It also encourages data separation which would reduce

> > file complexity and confusion

> >

> You are right, that's the best solution. I'll suggest him when we get in

> touch...

>

> Philo

> _______________________________________________

> LSC mailing list

> LSC at ldraw.org

> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://five.pairlist.net/pipermail/lsc/attachments/20071115/66f65267/attachment.html>