[LSC] File Format Restrictions for Official Parts

[Michael Heidemann]

I am with you.

mikeheide

Philo schrieb:

> I vote for it!

>

> Philo

>

> William Howard wrote:

>

>> Why not do both?  If the "Official Parts Format Specification" 

>> started with the LDraw File Format Spec as its "base", lists 

>> restrictions on it and then covers additional requirements for 

>> Official Parts we can have our cake and eat it!

>>

>> W

>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Philo" <philohome at free.fr>

>> To: "LDraw Standards Committee" <lsc at ldraw.org>

>> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 10:19 AM

>> Subject: Re: [LSC] File Format Restrictions for Official Parts

>>

>>

>>> Agreed! But then we are not writing a "File Format Restrictions for 

>>> Official Parts" but an "Official Parts Format Specifications" - 

>>> which would be quite useful !!!

>>>

>>> Philo

>>>

>>> William Howard wrote:

>>>

>>>> Which also raises two of the "tribal knowledge" items that needs 

>>>> covering in the document

>>>>

>>>> 1) precision (is it 3dp for parts/primitives and 4 dp for hi-res 

>>>> primitives)

>>>> 2) trailing 0s on numbers (1.5 or 1.500)

>>>>

>>> _______________________________________________

>>> LSC mailing list

>>> LSC at ldraw.org

>>> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc

>>>

>>

>>

>> _______________________________________________

>> LSC mailing list

>> LSC at ldraw.org

>> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc

>>

>>

>

> _______________________________________________

> LSC mailing list

> LSC at ldraw.org

> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc

>