[LSC] File Format Restrictions for Official Parts

[Philo]

I vote for it!

Philo

William Howard wrote:


> Why not do both?  If the "Official Parts Format Specification" started 

> with the LDraw File Format Spec as its "base", lists restrictions on it 

> and then covers additional requirements for Official Parts we can have 

> our cake and eat it!

> 

> W

> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Philo" <philohome at free.fr>

> To: "LDraw Standards Committee" <lsc at ldraw.org>

> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 10:19 AM

> Subject: Re: [LSC] File Format Restrictions for Official Parts

> 

> 

>> Agreed! But then we are not writing a "File Format Restrictions for 

>> Official Parts" but an "Official Parts Format Specifications" - which 

>> would be quite useful !!!

>>

>> Philo

>>

>> William Howard wrote:

>>

>>> Which also raises two of the "tribal knowledge" items that needs 

>>> covering in the document

>>>

>>> 1) precision (is it 3dp for parts/primitives and 4 dp for hi-res 

>>> primitives)

>>> 2) trailing 0s on numbers (1.5 or 1.500)

>>>

>> _______________________________________________

>> LSC mailing list

>> LSC at ldraw.org

>> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc

>>

> 

> 

> _______________________________________________

> LSC mailing list

> LSC at ldraw.org

> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc

> 

>