[LSC] Standard Unofficial directory?
Travis Cobbs
tcobbs at gmail.com
Tue Mar 6 12:24:07 EST 2007
According to the bylaws, each standards committee gets to agree upon its own
rules for voting. If I remember correctly, we agreed that simple majority
carries the vote, and abstentions count as NO votes.
--Travis
On 3/6/07, Ross Crawford <ross.crawford at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Well I don't really think that's a big problem. Worst case scenario we
> get a 3-2 vote, which we'd then have to decide if it's enough to
> implement, if we get 4-1 for making it a standard, I'm happy to go with
> the obvious concensus.
>
> Is their any written rules for the LSC votes? If it's simple majority,
> then 3-2 is obviously enough too.
>
> ROSCO
>
> Travis Cobbs wrote:
> > Nope. Based on the lugnet posts, I think that Ross feels more strongly
> > that it shouldn't be made a standard than I personally feel that it
> > should be made a standard. As such, I'm hesitant myself to put it to a
> > vote. I know how I'd vote (for standardizing it), but I'm not 100% it's
> > something I should bring up, given my own bias on the issue.
> >
> > --Travis
> >
> > On 3/5/07, *ldraw at holly-wood.it <mailto:ldraw at holly-wood.it>*
> > <ldraw at holly-wood.it <mailto:ldraw at holly-wood.it> > wrote:
> >
> > any progress here? please consider ruling also on
> > longfilenames http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dev/mac/?n=771 when
> > carring this.
> >
> > w.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > Da : Ross Crawford <ross.crawford at gmail.com
> > <mailto:ross.crawford at gmail.com>>
> > A : LDraw Standards Committee < lsc at ldraw.org <mailto:lsc at ldraw.org
> >>
> > Oggetto : [LSC] Standard Unofficial directory?
> > Data : Wed, 28 Feb 2007 06:35:12 +1100
> >
> > > See http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dev/mac/?n=768
> > <http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dev/mac/?n=768>
> > >
> > > LDview and Bricksmith (and possibly others?) now have the
> > > ability to download directly any unofficial parts needed
> > > for a model. Currently there is no standard for where
> > > programs should put these files to keep them separate
> > > from the "official" parts tree. There is no definite need
> > > for a separate directory, as programs can use the header
> > > to determine whether or not a part is official. But I can
> > > see the advantages of defining a standard directory, so
> > > all unofficial parts are kept separate, and programs all
> > > download unofficial files to the same place.
> > >
> > > One problem that arises is the old unofficial parts end up
> > > accumulating in the unofficial directory after they
> > > become official. Garbage collection should probably be up
> > > to the individual programs though. As long as the
> > > official tree is searched first, it shouldn't present a
> > > problem for models.
> > >
> > > Anyone have any thoughts?
> > >
> > > ROSCO
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > LSC mailing list
> > > LSC at ldraw.org <mailto:LSC at ldraw.org>
> > > http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc
> > _______________________________________________
> > LSC mailing list
> > LSC at ldraw.org <mailto:LSC at ldraw.org>
> > http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LSC mailing list
> > LSC at ldraw.org
> > http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc
> _______________________________________________
> LSC mailing list
> LSC at ldraw.org
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://five.pairlist.net/pipermail/lsc/attachments/20070306/4f2f0f17/attachment.html>
More information about the LSC
mailing list