[LSC] Standard Unofficial directory?

Travis Cobbs tcobbs at gmail.com
Tue Mar 6 12:24:07 EST 2007


According to the bylaws, each standards committee gets to agree upon its own
rules for voting. If I remember correctly, we agreed that simple majority
carries the vote, and abstentions count as NO votes.

--Travis

On 3/6/07, Ross Crawford <ross.crawford at gmail.com> wrote:

>

> Well I don't really think that's a big problem. Worst case scenario we

> get a 3-2 vote, which we'd then have to decide if it's enough to

> implement, if we get 4-1 for making it a standard, I'm happy to go with

> the obvious concensus.

>

> Is their any written rules for the LSC votes? If it's simple majority,

> then 3-2 is obviously enough too.

>

> ROSCO

>

> Travis Cobbs wrote:

> > Nope. Based on the lugnet posts, I think that Ross feels more strongly

> > that it shouldn't be made a standard than I personally feel that it

> > should be made a standard. As such, I'm hesitant myself to put it to a

> > vote. I know how I'd vote (for standardizing it), but I'm not 100% it's

> > something I should bring up, given my own bias on the issue.

> >

> > --Travis

> >

> > On 3/5/07, *ldraw at holly-wood.it <mailto:ldraw at holly-wood.it>*

> > <ldraw at holly-wood.it <mailto:ldraw at holly-wood.it> > wrote:

> >

> > any progress here? please consider ruling also on

> > longfilenames http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dev/mac/?n=771 when

> > carring this.

> >

> > w.

> >

> >

> > ----- Original Message -----

> > Da : Ross Crawford <ross.crawford at gmail.com

> > <mailto:ross.crawford at gmail.com>>

> > A : LDraw Standards Committee < lsc at ldraw.org <mailto:lsc at ldraw.org

> >>

> > Oggetto : [LSC] Standard Unofficial directory?

> > Data : Wed, 28 Feb 2007 06:35:12 +1100

> >

> > > See http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dev/mac/?n=768

> > <http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dev/mac/?n=768>

> > >

> > > LDview and Bricksmith (and possibly others?) now have the

> > > ability to download directly any unofficial parts needed

> > > for a model. Currently there is no standard for where

> > > programs should put these files to keep them separate

> > > from the "official" parts tree. There is no definite need

> > > for a separate directory, as programs can use the header

> > > to determine whether or not a part is official. But I can

> > > see the advantages of defining a standard directory, so

> > > all unofficial parts are kept separate, and programs all

> > > download unofficial files to the same place.

> > >

> > > One problem that arises is the old unofficial parts end up

> > > accumulating in the unofficial directory after they

> > > become official. Garbage collection should probably be up

> > > to the individual programs though. As long as the

> > > official tree is searched first, it shouldn't present a

> > > problem for models.

> > >

> > > Anyone have any thoughts?

> > >

> > > ROSCO

> > > _______________________________________________

> > > LSC mailing list

> > > LSC at ldraw.org <mailto:LSC at ldraw.org>

> > > http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc

> > _______________________________________________

> > LSC mailing list

> > LSC at ldraw.org <mailto:LSC at ldraw.org>

> > http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc

> >

> >

> >

> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------

> >

> > _______________________________________________

> > LSC mailing list

> > LSC at ldraw.org

> > http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc

> _______________________________________________

> LSC mailing list

> LSC at ldraw.org

> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://five.pairlist.net/pipermail/lsc/attachments/20070306/4f2f0f17/attachment.html>


More information about the LSC mailing list