[LSC] Updated CATEGORY and KEYWORD specs

[Travis Cobbs]

Sorry; that was just my bad memory.  I still think they would have been
better left alone, but did indeed agree to the change.  We can forget I
brought that back up.

--Travis

On 7/4/07, Chris Dee <chris_w_dee at hotmail.com> wrote:

>

>  Sorry, but isn't a bit late to raise that since the LSC already approved

> the Header Specification (http://www.ldraw.org/Article398.html), or are

> you saying that is now in dispute.

>

>

>

> I need to know urgently, as the CA header migration is well underway –

> over 50% complete – and the new headers are based on this "agreement".

>

>

>

> Chris

>

>

>   ------------------------------

>

> *From:* lsc-bounces at ldraw.org [mailto:lsc-bounces at ldraw.org] *On Behalf Of

> *Travis Cobbs

> *Sent:* 04 July 2007 19:31

> *To:* LDraw Standards Committee

> *Subject:* Re: [LSC] Updated CATEGORY and KEYWORD specs

>

>

>

> To summarize the previous discussion, we basically agreed that the list of

> categories was in the hands of the PT admins, and not much else.  It doesn't

> appear that we talked about the fact that !CATEGORY and !KEYWORDS will break

> current software (like MLCad).  I'm concerned about that, purely based on

> the fact that MLCad hasn't been updated in quite some time, and probably

> won't be updated for quite a while longer.

>

> --Travis

>

> On 7/4/07, *Travis Cobbs* <tcobbs at gmail.com> wrote:

>

> For those of you who (like me) don't really remember what was discussed

> before, the discussion took place starting on 05-Nov-06, and continued

> through 03-Jan-07.  The title of the messages was the same as this one.

>

> --Travis

>

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> LSC mailing list

> LSC at ldraw.org

> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc

>

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://five.pairlist.net/pipermail/lsc/attachments/20070704/4d7ad031/attachment.htm>