[LSC] Proposed additional !LDRAW_ORG entries

Ross Crawford ross.crawford at gmail.com
Mon Sep 25 02:23:12 EDT 2006


William Howard wrote:
> (Changed the Subject line)
> 
> Anything starting with Unofficial_ is fine by me (in fact anything the PT
> Admins are happy with is fine by me), so long as the parts in the official
> library are changed before release

Well I think my issue is not that it should start with Unofficial_, but 
that it shouldn't start with Official_. The reason I see for that 
restriction is that they will be publicly available, and we don't want 
files out there starting with Official_ that aren't official.

ROSCO

> -----Original Message-----
> From: lsc-bounces at ldraw.org [mailto:lsc-bounces at ldraw.org] On Behalf Of
> LDraw
> Sent: 24 September 2006 20:33
> To: LSC at ldraw.org
> Subject: [LSC] Proposed changes to the LDraw "~Moved to" files header
> 
> 
> dear lsc, 
> 
> please discuss on this leftover from the primary file header discussion 
> 
>  ------------Beginning of proposal----------
> Proposed is to modify the !LDRAW_ORG statement for PT-usage only as 
> following: 
> 
> 0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part| Unofficial_Subpart| Unofficial_Primitive
> |Unofficial_48_Primitive|Unofficial_Shortcut 
> 
> A syntax like "Unofficial Part", "Subpart_unofficial",
> "Unofficial_Element", "Non-official Part", "Shortcut not certified" is not 
> permitted.
>  ---------------End of proposal-------------- 
> 
> 
> please consider also this posting by chris: 
> 
> http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dat/parts/?n=6015 
> 
> and decide if the issue should be handed over to the PT admins instead of 
> being discussed in the LSC. 
> 
> w.
> _______________________________________________
> LSC mailing list
> LSC at ldraw.org
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LSC mailing list
> LSC at ldraw.org
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc
> 


More information about the LSC mailing list