[LSC] Proposed additional !LDRAW_ORG entries
Ross Crawford
ross.crawford at gmail.com
Mon Sep 25 02:23:12 EDT 2006
William Howard wrote:
> (Changed the Subject line)
>
> Anything starting with Unofficial_ is fine by me (in fact anything the PT
> Admins are happy with is fine by me), so long as the parts in the official
> library are changed before release
Well I think my issue is not that it should start with Unofficial_, but
that it shouldn't start with Official_. The reason I see for that
restriction is that they will be publicly available, and we don't want
files out there starting with Official_ that aren't official.
ROSCO
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lsc-bounces at ldraw.org [mailto:lsc-bounces at ldraw.org] On Behalf Of
> LDraw
> Sent: 24 September 2006 20:33
> To: LSC at ldraw.org
> Subject: [LSC] Proposed changes to the LDraw "~Moved to" files header
>
>
> dear lsc,
>
> please discuss on this leftover from the primary file header discussion
>
> ------------Beginning of proposal----------
> Proposed is to modify the !LDRAW_ORG statement for PT-usage only as
> following:
>
> 0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part| Unofficial_Subpart| Unofficial_Primitive
> |Unofficial_48_Primitive|Unofficial_Shortcut
>
> A syntax like "Unofficial Part", "Subpart_unofficial",
> "Unofficial_Element", "Non-official Part", "Shortcut not certified" is not
> permitted.
> ---------------End of proposal--------------
>
>
> please consider also this posting by chris:
>
> http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dat/parts/?n=6015
>
> and decide if the issue should be handed over to the PT admins instead of
> being discussed in the LSC.
>
> w.
> _______________________________________________
> LSC mailing list
> LSC at ldraw.org
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LSC mailing list
> LSC at ldraw.org
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc
>
More information about the LSC
mailing list