[LSC] Re: Call For Votes: Proposed changes to the LDraw part header tosupport the CA - Version 7

[LDraw]

Travis Cobbs writes:
> Do we submit this to the part admins and ldraw.org webmasters for further
> action?  (Willy, Steve, etc.: are you guys still listening, by the way?)

sure I do, but since the LSC is not my sandbox I was busy keeping my mouth 
shut - well ... 

> I'm assuming the information below will be posted on ldraw.org somewhere.
> It's probably best that whoever does that handles the formatting.

I suggest to do the same procedure we use for the steerco announcements. 
being one of the three content manager I'll post it on ldraw's front page. 
(hopefully today) 

> Finally, should this be posted to lugnet, as an official action of the 
> LSC?
> I think visibility of what we're doing would be good, but I'm not sure 
> that
> in this particular instance it's the best action to take.  (It might put 
> an
> unfair amount of pressure on the parts admins.)

afterwards some of LSC should cross-post it to lugnet.announce, 
lugnet.cad.dat.parts and lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw. I'd like to see this 
published asap not to push pressure on the PT admins but to show that we are 
working on the issue. how and when the CA library is ready is the exclusive 
territory of the PT admins. 

I'd like to know from the LSC if they want thier own page at ldraw.org to 
keep track of the work they have done and the issues to discuss: 

http://five.pairlist.net/pipermail/lsc/2006-July/000407.html + some issues  
that popped up during the header-discussion. 

w.