[LSC] RE: [Ldraw-content] Re: Adopting the "de-facto" BFC standard - CARRIED

[Chris Dee]

Yes that content is not in PostNuke, but if you want to let me know how 
you'd like these changed, I can update them easily.

I'd suggest in both, I just point the "What's this BFC?" to the 
specification article.

Is there anything in the reviewfaq section "How do I check a file for BFC 
Compliance?" that you want changing?

Chris Dee
(chris_w_dee at hotmail.com)





>From: "LDraw" <ldraw at holly-wood.it>
>Reply-To: ldraw-content at ldraw.org
>To: LDraw Standards Committee <lsc at ldraw.org>
>CC: 'LDraw Content' <ldraw-content at ldraw.org>, parts at ldraw.org
>Subject: [Ldraw-content] Re: Adopting the "de-facto" BFC standard - CARRIED
>Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 10:38:10 +0200
>
>that's correct. it is PT territory and only the PT admins have previleges 
>to edit those pages.
>
>w.
>
>
>William Howard writes:
>
>>Don't think the LSC are allowed to edit those, so someone else will have 
>>to
>>step up to mark.
>>
>>William
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: lsc-bounces at ldraw.org [mailto:lsc-bounces at ldraw.org] On Behalf Of
>>LDraw
>>Sent: 15 October 2006 23:08
>>To: LDraw Standards Committee; parts at ldraw.org; LDraw Content
>>Subject: Re: [LSC] Adopting the "de-facto" BFC standard - CARRIED
>>
>>
>>now that this has become the new standard it would be appropriate to edit 
>>all the the text and the links in the PT references still pointing to 
>>steve's geocity page. Example:
>>
>>http://www.ldraw.org/library/tracker/ref/faq/
>>http://www.ldraw.org/library/tracker/ref/reviewfaq/
>>
>>"For more information about BFC, see Steve Bliss' BFC page."
>>
>>w.
>>
>>
>>William Howard schrieb:
>>>Having finally managed to edit out references to "de-facto" in the BFC
>>>standard article, I have announced this decision on Lugnet
>>>
>>>W
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: lsc-bounces at ldraw.org [mailto:lsc-bounces at ldraw.org] On Behalf Of
>>>William Howard
>>>Sent: 12 October 2006 08:17
>>>To: 'LDraw Standards Committee'
>>>Subject: RE: [LSC] Adopting the "de-facto" BFC standard - CARRIED
>>>
>>>
>>>With five votes for and zero against, this proposal is carried
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: lsc-bounces at ldraw.org [mailto:lsc-bounces at ldraw.org] On Behalf Of
>>>William Howard
>>>Sent: 10 October 2006 21:24
>>>To: 'LDraw Standards Committee'
>>>Subject: [LSC] Call for votes: Adopting the "de-facto" BFC standard
>>>
>>>
>>>Background:
>>>
>>>The BFC "standard"
>>>
>>(http://www.ldraw.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=217)
>>>apparently has never had LSC approval.
>>>
>>>------------Beginning of proposal----------
>>>That the LSC adopts the above "de-facto" standard as the draft version of
>>>the official BFC standard
>>>---------------End of proposal--------------
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>LSC mailing list
>>>LSC at ldraw.org
>>>http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>LSC mailing list
>>>LSC at ldraw.org
>>>http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>LSC mailing list
>>>LSC at ldraw.org
>>>http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc
>>>
>>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>LSC mailing list
>>LSC at ldraw.org
>>http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>LSC mailing list
>>LSC at ldraw.org
>>http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ldraw-content mailing list
>Ldraw-content at ldraw.org
>http://mail.peeron.com/mailman/listinfo/ldraw-content