[LSC] Ambiguities in the draft BFC spec - syntax

[Ross Crawford]

William Howard wrote:
> The following syntax seems to cover all the bases
> 
> 0 BFC (NOCERTIFY | CERTIFY [CW|{CCW}])
> 0 BFC ([CLIP] [CW|CCW] | NOCLIP | INVERTNEXT)

I think that should be:

0 BFC (CLIP [CW|CCW] | NOCLIP | INVERTNEXT)

otherwise 0 BFC CW would be legal.

ROSCO