[LSC] Web page request: List of official meta-commands
William Howard
william at howard-family.fsworld.co.uk
Wed Oct 11 13:32:26 EDT 2006
Many thanks for that Orion.
-----Original Message-----
From: lsc-bounces at ldraw.org [mailto:lsc-bounces at ldraw.org] On Behalf Of
Orion Pobursky
Sent: 10 October 2006 22:14
To: LDraw Standards Committee
Cc: LDraw Content List
Subject: Re: [LSC] Web page request: List of official meta-commands
Orion Pobursky wrote:
> William Howard wrote:
>> The following is the list of meta-commands (and any related article
>> number)
>> that the LSC believes to be current
>>
>> Could we get a page on the web site with these details please
>>
>> The page should link to article 342 "List of Known META Commands and the
>> Programs That Use Them"
>>
>> Author (refer LDraw 0.27 file format - article 45)
>> BFC (refer BFC de-facto spec - article 217)
>> !CATEGORY (refer category and keywords spec - article 340)
>> CLEAR (refer LDraw 0.27 file format - article 45)
>> !CMDLINE (refer header spec - article 398) !COLOUR (refer
>> colour specification - article 299)
>> !HELP (refer header specification - article 398)
>> !HISTORY (refer header specification - article 398)
>> !KEYWORDS (refer category and keywords spec - article 340)
>> !LDRAW_ORG (refer header specification - article 398) LDRAW_ORG
>> (deprecated in favour of !LDRAW_ORG)
>> !LICENSE (refer header specification - article 398)
>> Name (refer LDraw 0.27 file format - article 45)
>> PAUSE (refer LDraw 0.27 file format - article 45)
>> PRINT (refer LDraw 0.27 file format - article 45) SAVE
>> (refer LDraw 0.27 file format - article 45)
>> STEP (refer LDraw 0.27 file format - article 45)
>> WRITE (refer LDraw 0.27 file format - article 45)
>>
>> If the page could also reference the LSC decision to prefix all new
>> official
>> meta-commands with a ! this would be good (see
>> http://five.pairlist.net/pipermail/lsc/2003-December/000063.html)
>
> I'll work on this today.
>
Okay, done:
http://www.ldraw.org/article/401
A couple more things:
Any agreement regarding the 1.0.0 file spec? I find it amusing (in a
funny way, not in a sarcastic way) that the LSC was founded to adopt
1.0.0 spec and 4 years later it still hasn't been officially ratified.
Was there some sort of discussion on this while I was cavorting about
the Western Pacific?
We can, and probably should, create an LSC group on the LDraw.org
website that would allow you to edit the specifications articles.
-Orion
--
We don't stop playing because we grow old;
we grow old because we stop playing
-George Bernard Shaw
_______________________________________________
LSC mailing list
LSC at ldraw.org
http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc
More information about the LSC
mailing list