[LSC] Call for votes: Proposed changes to the LDraw"~Moved to" files header

[Lars C. Hassing]

William Howard wrote:
>> Chris Dee schrieb:
>>> I am happy with this, if no-one sees a problem with getting rid of the "0 
>>> WRITE" line. Do any tools make use of this to encourage model authors to 
>>> update the file to use the real part?
> 
> MLCad does update parts, but a quick search of the strings in the code
> indicates that it uses the "~Moved to" line of the header and not the WRITE
> line.


L3P ignores the WRITE line, but the "~Moved to " causes this message:
"NOTABENE "XXX.DAT" referenced by "YYY.DAT": Moved to ZZZ.DAT"
/Lars