[LSC] Updated CATEGORY and KEYWORD specs

[William Howard]

How about the Colour Def Lang Extn? (Article 299)

-----Original Message-----
From: lsc-bounces at ldraw.org [mailto:lsc-bounces at ldraw.org] On Behalf Of
William Howard
Sent: 05 November 2006 23:42
To: 'LDraw Standards Committee'
Subject: RE: [LSC] Updated CATEGORY and KEYWORD specs


Thanks for the clarification.

As the LDraw 1.0.0 standard references it, looks like there's another one to
adopt before we get to "the main event"

W

-----Original Message-----
From: lsc-bounces at ldraw.org [mailto:lsc-bounces at ldraw.org] On Behalf Of
Orion Pobursky
Sent: 05 November 2006 23:38
To: LDraw Standards Committee
Subject: Re: [LSC] Updated CATEGORY and KEYWORD specs


This standard was discussed and created prior to the formation of the 
LSC and as such was never formally ratified by the LSC.

-Orion

-- 
We don't stop playing because we grow old;
we grow old because we stop playing
-George Bernard Shaw

William Howard wrote:
> Had the Category and Keywords extension (ie the old article 340) been
> formally ratify by the LSC?  If it had been, then any changes to it should
> have been discussed within the LSC before the article is edited.  If not,
> then the article should not be under the "LDraw.org File Format Standards"
> 
> The LDraw File Format Version 1.0.0 article references the Category and
> Keywords article (amoung others) so we need to be clear on its status
> *before* we can start the process of ratifying the 1.0.0 standard
> 
> W
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lsc-bounces at ldraw.org [mailto:lsc-bounces at ldraw.org] On Behalf Of
> LDraw
> Sent: 05 November 2006 23:00
> To: lsc at ldraw.org; parts at ldraw.org
> Subject: [LSC] Updated CATEGORY and KEYWORD specs
> 
> 
> hi,
> 
> we the content managers plan to move all the specs currently at the PT:
> 
> http://www.ldraw.org/library/tracker/ref/
> 
> to the postnuke at:
> 
> http://www.ldraw.org/article/292
> 
> to avoid confusion having specs spread all over the site. since the PT 
> references are PT territory chris has identified that the following 
> should stay in the Parts Tracker. they are mainly about the process of 
> posting and reviewing parts, not about the LDraw standards:
> 
> - Parts Tracker Policies
> - Parts Tracker FAQ
> - Parts Reviewing FAQ
> - Review Posting Information
> - L3P -check Messages
> - Parts Tracker Development Status
> - Parts Tracker App Files
> 
> So rationalization and review would probably be worthwhile.
> 
> These:
> - FAQ for LDraw Part Numbers
> - File Types FAQ
> - Pattern Codes
> - CATEGORY and KEYWORDS FAQ
> 
> should probably be formalized from FAQs into "complete" documentation.
> 
> That leaves:
> 
> - Primitives Reference
> 
> which although the link to it should live in Specifications | Guides, 
> chris very strongly prefers to keep the content where it is. By using 
> SSI technology it is very easy for him to maintain as the primitive 
> library grows.
> 
> with you defining the BFC I started editing the already existing 
> CATEGORY and KEYWORD specs at:
> 
> http://www.ldraw.org/article/340
> 
> have a look at your convenience and compare them with the current FAQ at:
> 
> http://www.ldraw.org/library/tracker/ref/catkeyfaq/
> 
> please formalize the BFC first! I post this for the sole reason that 
> I'll be on holiday until mid december and wanted it done.
> 
> w.
> _______________________________________________
> LSC mailing list
> LSC at ldraw.org
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LSC mailing list
> LSC at ldraw.org
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc
> 
_______________________________________________
LSC mailing list
LSC at ldraw.org
http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc


_______________________________________________
LSC mailing list
LSC at ldraw.org
http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc