[LSC] Suggestion: take history out of part files

[Ross Crawford]

I agree it increases the risk, but I don't think the change history is 
something that is all that important (to library users). All we really 
need to keep with the DAT file is the author, and the person who last 
changed the file, the rest of the history is unimportant to most users.

ROSCO

Lars C. Hassing wrote:
> Is the "change log bloat" really that big ?
> 
> My experience tells that separating information will inevitably result 
> in information loss.
> 
> I very much like the idea of keeping history as close to the source as 
> possible,
> which means within the DAT files.
> /Lars
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LSC mailing list
> LSC at ldraw.org
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/lsc
>