[Coco] NitrOS9 and 6309 code

[Gene Heskett]

On Saturday 01 June 2019 01:22:11 pm Jeff Teunissen wrote:

> On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 12:57 PM Gene Heskett <gheskett at shentel.net> 
wrote:
> > On Saturday 01 June 2019 12:38:03 pm Jeff Teunissen wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 7:54 AM Robert Gault <robert.gault at att.net>
> >
> > wrote:
> > > > I just changed byte six in gshell from $11 to $17, verified it,
> > > > and started Multi-Vue. MV ran correctly and there was no 234
> > > > error. I can't reproduce your error, so exactly what did you do
> > > > with gshell?
> > >
> > > OK, I'll try Vaughn Cato's Vu. Now, I am running the version of
> > > NitrOS9 that exists in the hg repository, or at least hg from
> > > a couple of days ago. I do _exactly_ this:
>
> [snip]
>
> > That conflicts with the (v for vdg) windows descriptors someone
> > added. I had to rename the patched tsedit from vi to to vim to get
> > rid of that error. Its got nothing to do with 63 vs 68 09's. Does
> > this only happen on a 6309? I'd think it would be rejected by
> > either. In my case just the expansion beyond a two char name was
> > enough to fix the confusion.
>
> It doesn't conflict. You may be thinking of the VIRQ device /VI, but
> that conflict doesn't happen on my machines because I renamed the
> driver to /VQ
>
6 of one, half dozen of the other. Either fix should work.
> And like I said, it happens to all program modules I have tried,
> regardless of their names -- in hg, something doesn't allow 6309
> modules to run on a 6309 processor.

File a bug then.  It works here, but I've not pulled and built/installed 
in around 3 years, so whatever it is, is fairly recent.

Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>