[Coco] Basic09 6309 version

[Wayne Campbell]

Oh, and I was still emulating the 6309 processor.

On May 25, 2017 10:53 AM, "Wayne Campbell" <asa.rand at gmail.com> wrote:

> I put the 6809 version of B09 in the CMDS directory and ran a copy of the
> JD procedure with no FLOAT() functions. It ran without errors and no
> Hitting DIVQ_X error in VCC.
>
>
> On May 25, 2017 2:17 AM, "Bill Pierce via Coco" <coco at maltedmedia.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I did a search through the nitros9 sources and only found 6 references to
>> "divq". 2 were in asm and disasm which were only references for the
>> programs asm/disasm functionality and no actual running code, 2 were in 2
>> of Boisy's test routines in one of his folders (not used for anything), and
>> the other 2 were in basic09 and runb. So they are the only 2 nitros9
>> modules that would rare their ugly heads on this.
>>
>> I do remember some years ago when Joseph was developing VCC that there
>> was some mention of something being missing in the 6309 core. I've searched
>> but couldn't find where I saw it (it was loooong ago). I've even mentioned
>> it in the issues on the VCC repo issues page. We may have found what it was.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Bill Pierce
>> "Charlie stole the handle, and the train it won't stop going, no way to
>> slow down!" - Ian Anderson - Jethro Tull
>>
>> My Music from the Tandy/Radio Shack Color Computer 2 & 3
>> https://sites.google.com/site/dabarnstudio/
>> Co-Contributor, Co-Editor for CocoPedia
>> http://www.cocopedia.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
>>
>> E-Mail: ooogalapasooo at aol.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Walter Zambotti <zambotti at iinet.net.au>
>> To: 'CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts' <coco at maltedmedia.com>
>> Sent: Thu, May 25, 2017 3:31 am
>> Subject: Re: [Coco] Basic09 6309 version
>>
>> >This could explain the Hitting DIVQ_X error that VCC keeps complaining
>> about.This error could be isolated to either VCC or BASIC09_6309.We can
>> eliminate which one is the problem by running the BASIC09_6309 version on a
>> real 6309 coco and not in VCC.  If the same problem persists then the
>> problem in in BASIC09_6309.  If it does not persist then the problem is in
>> VCC.I don't have a 6309 in my CoCo so I can't volunteer to help.Any takers
>> out there?Walter-----Original Message-----From: Coco [mailto:
>> coco-bounces at maltedmedia.com] On Behalf Of Wayne CampbellSent: Thursday,
>> 25 May 2017 12:11 PMTo: CoCoList <coco at maltedmedia.com>Subject: Re:
>> [Coco] Basic09 6309 versionThis could explain the Hitting DIVQ_X error that
>> VCC keeps complaining about.On May 24, 2017 8:52 PM, "William Astle" <
>> lost at l-w.ca> wrote:My guess is the VCC isn't implementing DIVQ
>> correctly, probably by not providing the remainder unless regular integer
>> division is also failing.--Coco mailing listCoco at maltedmedia.comhttps://
>> pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco-- Coco mailing
>> listCoco at maltedmedia.comhttps://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>>
>> --
>> Coco mailing list
>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>>
>