[Coco] New version of Coco SDC Explorer (0.30)

[Guillaume Major]

Hi Pere,

I know what going on. I inadvertently declared an FCB instruction after the 
SDC file listing array (DISKARR). Depending on the assembler you are using, 
it can either create a multi segment binary file with multiple origins (like 
CCASM), or embed the entire array in the binary, which seems to be your 
case.

I fixed the issue and updated the archive (both the program and the source 
code). I can't test the Dragon version though. Please let me know if it is 
ok now.

Thanks,
Guillaume


"Pere Serrat" <psergm at gmail.com> wrote in 
message news:3C2C2D98EF184EFDA4EDEEC979E5CD3E at DELL17...
> Hi Guillaume,
> I have got to compile your source, and the result binary v0.30 works
> like a charm on my Dragon64, Shift left and right and shift S work
> perfect, thanks a lot!
> The odd thing is that it is longer (some 16841 bytes)
> This seems due to the fact that at the end of the code it is appended
> a lot of space, say 512x16 (DISKARR), whilst prior versions were much
> shorter than that ...
> Is that correct?
> Thanks in advance
> pere
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -Mensaje original----- 
> From: Pere Serrat
> Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 9:42 PM
> To: coco at maltedmedia.com
> Subject: New version of Coco SDC Explorer (0.30)
>
> Hi Guillaume.
> Have given a peek at the asm source and found the  conditional code
> for the ports for CoCo/Dragon.
> The I searched through the binary that fails and it contains FF49, this is
> not used in Dragon, so it seems that it has been packed using the CoCo
> output from the compilation instead ... I might be wrong, of course.
>
> kind regards
> pere
>
>
>
> -- 
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>