[Coco] MAME

[Salvador Garcia]

Thank you both for your reply. As I mention, perhaps the question was obvious, but was curious to determine whether there were other parties involved. Salvador




      From: Christopher R. Hawks <chawks at dls.net>
 To: coco at maltedmedia.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2017 11:10 AM
 Subject: Re: [Coco] MAME
   
On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 14:40:58 +0000 (UTC)
Salvador Garcia via Coco <coco at maltedmedia.com> wrote:

> Perhaps an obvious question, but is (or are) the legal owner(s) or
> the ROMs? Is it Tandy/Radio Shack, or are other parties involved?
> 
> Salvador
> 

    Like the screen says on power up, "UNDER LICENSE FROM MICROSOFT".

(At least Extended Basic and above.)

>      From: Barry Nelson <barry.nelson at amobiledevice.com>
>  To: coco at maltedmedia.com 
>  Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2017 8:28 PM
>  Subject: [Coco] MAME
>    
> As far as the roms for MAME are concerned, we don’t “talk" about that
> unfortunately, because those files are not legal to distribute yet
> for the CoCo. At least we don’t “officially” talk about it. You would
> be taking a risk mentioning any sites that have those files hosted in
> your video. Maybe not a big risk, but still...
> 




Christopher R. Hawks
HAWKSoft
-- 
Without knowing the force of words, it is impossible to know men.
        --Confucious
----------------------------------------
      \  ^__^                        
        \  (oo)\_______                
          (__)\      )\/\          
              ||----w |                
              ||    ||                

-- 
Coco mailing list
Coco at maltedmedia.com
https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco