[Coco] Fwd: IP packets on my coco

[Brett Gordon]

yeah...When there are no incoming packets i yield the process... i put too
big of a number...(too lazy to look up the params for pause()!)  Anyway..
with a look through the docs i came up with a idle delay that get thw ping
average down to 160 ms.

Brett M Gordon
On Jun 6, 2016 12:22 PM, "John W. Linville" <linville at tuxdriver.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 10:04:42PM -0400, Brett Gordon wrote:
> > Huzzahs! uIP worked.   First-ever coco ping results:
> >
> > 64 bytes from 192.168.42.2: icmp_req=19 ttl=64 time=994 ms
> > 64 bytes from 192.168.42.2: icmp_req=20 ttl=64 time=997 ms
> > 64 bytes from 192.168.42.2: icmp_req=21 ttl=64 time=979 ms
> > 64 bytes from 192.168.42.2: icmp_req=22 ttl=64 time=966 ms
> > 64 bytes from 192.168.42.2: icmp_req=23 ttl=64 time=969 ms
> > 64 bytes from 192.168.42.2: icmp_req=24 ttl=64 time=981 ms
> > 64 bytes from 192.168.42.2: icmp_req=25 ttl=64 time=994 ms
> > 64 bytes from 192.168.42.2: icmp_req=26 ttl=64 time=1020 ms
> > 64 bytes from 192.168.42.2: icmp_req=27 ttl=64 time=40.6 ms
> > ^C
> > --- 192.168.42.2 ping statistics ---
> > 27 packets transmitted, 27 received, 0% packet loss, time 25995ms
> > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.614/938.832/1020.182/176.745 ms, pipe 2
>
> Hey, congrats on proving that the CoCo actually _can_ do it in
> software.  Those 1 second ping times look a little painful...is there
> any external reason for that delay?
>
> John
> --
> John W. Linville                Someday the world will need a hero, and you
> linville at tuxdriver.com                  might be all we have.  Be ready.
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>