[Coco] 512k upgrade for coco3
Walter Miraglia
walter.miraglia at gmail.com
Thu Sep 24 20:32:55 EDT 2015
Ok I thought so, but i was looking at the schematic and thought, perhaps
because the ram in my 512k upgrade was dynamic, it too required the little
caps to remain... i was just looking for a reason as to why the 512k ram up
grade i have is flakey :)
ok i will have to pursue other avenues...
ok i wont have to order 82pf caps unless i give up on 512k :)
thanks for your reply. :)
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 8:26 PM, David Ladd <davidwladd at gmail.com> wrote:
> There are two caps that need to be removed for any upgrade to 512K, 1M, 2M,
> those rare larger boards.
>
> Those two caps are only required if using the base 128K.
>
> On Thursday, September 24, 2015, Walter Miraglia <
> walter.miraglia at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi there. I am wondering, if I am upgrading my coco3 with an older
> dual
> > 30 pin sim based upgrade that uses dynamic ram sims, do I need to remove
> > the two small caps (82 and 27 pf caps on the RAS and CAS lines)? Or is
> > that only for the 512k static ram upgrades triad one?
> >
> > I wonder as I am having issues with an old ram upgrade where basic ram
> > tests seem to pass but more involved use of ram, running applications
> like
> > donkey kong seem to crash. I did remove those two caps and installed my
> > 512k dram based ram upgrade. I'm wondering if I should have left them?
> > Should I solder in a couple and try it again? ( I would have to order
> some
> > )
> >
> > Please advise. Any help appreciated.
> >
> > Sent from my iPad Mini
> >
> > --
> > Coco mailing list
> > Coco at maltedmedia.com <javascript:;>
> > https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
> >
>
>
> --
> Sent from Gmail Mobile on iOS.
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>
More information about the Coco
mailing list