[Coco] DS1216

[K. Pruitt]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "K. Pruitt" <pruittk at roadrunner.com>
To: "CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts" <coco at maltedmedia.com>
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Coco] DS1216


>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "K. Pruitt" <pruittk at roadrunner.com>
> To: "CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts" <coco at maltedmedia.com>
> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [Coco] DS1216
>
>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "George Ramsower" <georgera at gvtc.com>
>> To: <coco at maltedmedia.com>
>> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:06 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Coco] DS1216
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> On 9/21/2015 11:33 PM, K. Pruitt wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd can try and alter the disassembled source code for getclk and see 
>>>>> if I can change it to accept a parameter. No guarantees as it may 
>>>>> exceed my skill level, but I can give it a shot.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>  I just noticed that you said "getclk". It's "setclk" that has an input 
>>> issue with me. I hope you just typed the wrong name.
>>>
>>> George R.
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Coco mailing list
>>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>>> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>>>
>>
>> Yes, I just typed the wrong module name.
>>
>>
>>
>
> Well I won't be modifying the disassembled copy. It disassembled with some 
> op codes I've never even seen. Like "eim" and "aim"? and all the addresses 
> are off. Maybe this wasn't written in ML to begin with?. I have no idea 
> how to determine that.
>
> I'm lost. Sorry George. I think I have a another source file somewhere on 
> my system of setclk.  Maybe that one is okay. I'll try and find it and 
> check to see if it is different, or if it's just a copy I created with 
> disassembly awhile back and just forgot.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 

Not to hijack this thread, but rather than start an entire new thread with 
no context...

Anybody have any idea why setclk doesn't disassemble correctly?

eim? oim? aim? Where are these op codes coming from? Are these even real?

L02A5    eim   #$63,$0F,s

Seriously?  Is this actually legit code?