[Coco] Color BASIC 1.1 / memory detection
L. Curtis Boyle
curtisboyle at sasktel.net
Tue Feb 17 18:56:08 EST 2015
Use EXEC 41175 (I thinkā¦ going from memory) to see the version of the actual Color BASIC ROM.
L. Curtis Boyle
curtisboyle at sasktel.net
> On Feb 17, 2015, at 5:48 PM, Arthur Flexser <flexser at fiu.edu> wrote:
>
> Are you sure that your COLOR BASIC (not Extended Basic) is version 1.1?
> You cannot readily detect the Color Basic version with Extended Basic
> installed. If in doubt, pull the Extended Basic chip and see what the
> startup message reports. (Though I would think an F-board CoCo would
> indeed have Color Basic 1.1, not 1.0.)
>
> Art
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 5:14 PM, jon bird <news at onastick.clara.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have just recently resurrected my old Coco 1 (it's a 26-3004A variant)
>> and have been putting it back to an original (working) state (I had been
>> plugging various additional cards & even a Dragon ROM into it at some
>> point).
>>
>> The info I can find on this version of the CoCo was that it was shipped
>> with 16K RAM, Color BASIC. It had an Extended BASIC 1.1 ROM fitted many
>> years ago and as part of my various "upgrades", replaced the 16K RAM chips
>> with 4164 DRAMs & also switched over the jumpers.
>>
>> What I am finding though is that having restored the original Color BASIC
>> 1.1 ROM, it is only reporting a 16K memory fit. I'm pretty sure that when I
>> had the Dragon ROM fitted, it could access the full 32K (and I'm also
>> fairly sure I had OS9 running on it as well which suggests the full 64K is
>> accessible). So this seems to be a feature of the BASIC ROM.
>>
>> I did come across this article from the archive:
>>
>> http://coco.maltedmedia.narkive.com/2DM5LvJ2/color-basic-1-0-1-2-differen
>> ces
>>
>> which backs up some other information I found that the original 1.0 ROM
>> did not support >16K memory fit but that the 1.1 ROMs do.
>>
>> Can anyone shed some light on this behaviour?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>
>> Jon.
>>
>> --
>> == jon bird - software engineer
>> == <reply to address _may_ be invalid, real mail below>
>> == <reduce rsi, stop using the shift key>
>> == posted as: news 'at' onastick 'dot' clara.co.uk
>>
>>
>> --
>> Coco mailing list
>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>>
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>
More information about the Coco
mailing list