[Coco] 68B09E on coco2
embsys dev
embsysdev at gmail.com
Sun Feb 8 02:44:33 EST 2015
After reading this
http://www.cs.unc.edu/~yakowenk/coco/text/speed.html
I understand what is technically possible, what is useful, and the
underlying reasons why.
Can anybody confirm that a *genuine* MC68B09E *should* boot a coco2 at
0.89M? If that is so, then it seems reasonable to conclude my chip is
mislabeled and order another from somewhere else.
On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Arthur Flexser <flexser at fiu.edu> wrote:
> I know of no advantage to using a 68B09E in a CoCo 1 or 2. It does not
> allow "stable operation at 1.7 MHz". The video at that speed will be just
> as unstable as with a regular 6809.
>
> Art
>
> On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 12:11 AM, embsys dev <embsysdev at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > coco2, 26-3026 (socketed chips, melted kbd), 64k ram.
> >
> > I recently bought an MC68B09E from Jameco, but when I swapped it in all I
> > got was interesting colors and patterns, no sign on. I understood
> (perhaps
> > wrongly?) this was a drop-in upgrade that would allow stable operation at
> > 1.7MHz. I noticed some list discussion about Jameco having mislabeled
> > chips, any way to rule this in/out by inspection?
> >
> > Comments and advice?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Darryl
> >
> > --
> > Coco mailing list
> > Coco at maltedmedia.com
> > https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
> >
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>
More information about the Coco
mailing list