[Coco] Coco Prototyping Pak Ideas

[Chris]

I would think decoding would be used by most people? 
I would take a blank one with nothing but power rails if thats what most people would want.  

I think people could do their own buffering if they want. Having the most DIY space would better to let people do what they want IMO. 

No matter what you decide I’m going to need at least one. 

thanks!
-chris





> On Feb 6, 2015, at 6:53 PM, Zippster <zippster278 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> And 3.3v regulator (or 3 larger holes for the regulator pins)?
> 
> -Ed
> 
> 
>> On Feb 6, 2015, at 4:10 PM, Ronivon Costa <ronivon.costa at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Voltage shifter for 3.3v external devices?
>> 
>> On 6 February 2015 at 21:35, Tony Cappellini <cappy2112 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Message: 5
>>> Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 09:38:56 -0500
>>> From: "Kip Koon" <computerdoc at sc.rr.com>
>>> To: "'Coco Email List'" <coco at maltedmedia.com>
>>> Subject: [Coco] Coco Prototyping Pak Ideas
>>> Message-ID: <001c01d0421a$a9182860$
>>> fb487920$@sc.rr.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="us-ascii"
>>> 
>>> Hi Experimenters,
>>> 
>>>>> I designed the Coco Prototyping Pak so all the address decoding for
>>> projects
>>>>> would be available, however if a blank Prototyping Pak with just holes
>>> and
>>>>> power rails is what is preferred, I can do that too.  Ideas, thoughts,
>>>>> needs?
>>> 
>>> Should we have the option of adding buffering to the CPU signals?
>>> If so, which signals should be buffered?
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Coco mailing list
>>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>>> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Coco mailing list
>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
> 
> 
> -- 
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco