[Coco] CoCoSDC performance issue - can someone try this from OS-9?
Allen Huffman
alsplace at pobox.com
Sun Feb 1 20:44:22 EST 2015
> On Feb 1, 2015, at 7:09 PM, Richard E Crislip <rcrislip at neo.rr.com> wrote:
>
>> You're right, but he's trying to make a larger contiguous block of
>> space on the drive using defrag. That should work as expected.
>>
>
> Ahhh... doesn't that destroy the drive? Or are you using the DSave or
> some method similar to that?
“Optimize” from JWT Enterprises just makes files all use one segment. It does nothing for fragmented free space. It’s safe. All it’s really doing is:
1. open source file.
2. get size of source file.
3. create new file “_o” and set size to source file size (OS-9 makes it one segment).
4. read all of source file and write it in to destination.
5. delete source file.
6. rename “_o” to source file name.
OS-9 can be asked to create a file of $FFFF bytes, and it will return that in one segment if available. Very safe.
File System Repack from Burke & Burke is what I am running now, on a backup, just to see how it works on 128MB. His “cbm” Compress Bitmap program crashes, printing out garbage. I was fearing that Repack would have the same problems, but I ran it one one pass, and dcheck shows the file system is still intact. Maybe…
--
Allen Huffman - PO Box 22031 - Clive IA 50325 - 515-999-0227 (vmail/TXT only)
Sub-Etha Software - http://www.subethasoftware.com - Established 1990!
Sent from my MacBook.
P.S. Since 4/15/14, I have earned OVER $600 in Amazon gift cards via Swagbucks! Use my link and I get credit:
http://swagbucks.com/refer/allenhuffman
More information about the Coco
mailing list