[Coco] Does anyone have a Level3 disk that actually boots?
Bill Nobel
b_nobel at hotmail.com
Sat Nov 29 10:25:58 EST 2014
Speaking of DW Aaron, Did you have to do anything for changes in RBF/SCF for DW4? I am asking this as I need to figure out if I have to disassemble those modules from L3 or are they stock from Nitros9. So far L3 is based in these modules: Nitros9 (splits RBF/SCF) OS9P1 (calls nitros9) and IOMAN (maps and calls SCF/RBF). I think I do have to look at both SCF/RBF to see if Alan did any mods in those for the memory mapping but not sure yet.
Bill Nobel
> On Nov 29, 2014, at 12:59 AM, Aaron Wolfe <aawolfe at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Nov 28, 2014 10:22 AM, "Bill Pierce via Coco" <coco at maltedmedia.com>
> wrote:
>
>> So far, there is one MAJOR disadvantage to Level 3..... The drivewire4
> drivers will not function. The reason being the drivewire sits on the
> "line" as it is an RBF driver with SCF functions. and cannot be seperated.
>> <y question is.. could create another RBF module, renamed to "DW4" or
> something (same for SCF), then move ALL the dw drivers out to another
> space. How much is DW tied to RBF? I know it's tied heavily to SCF.
>
> The SCF, RBF, and clock functionality of Drivewire is already split into
> separate modules that do not communicate with each other. However, all
> three of these share a dependency on the common "DW sub" module that
> provides the low level serial communication. This common module will need
> to be available to both the rbf and SCF address space (and the clock if
> that's made into a separate area). So long as that is done, there should
> not be a problem.
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
More information about the Coco
mailing list