[Coco] CoCo Office suite
Bob Devries
devries.bob at gmail.com
Tue Nov 11 15:19:51 EST 2014
The Australian OS9 Newsletter started life (second incarnation from
1987) using the Stylograph word processor on OS9. However, we eventually
found it too buggy, especially with the large files. After a while, we
moved to Bob van der Poel's VED/VPrint, which was way more flexible.
Spell checking? Never used one. Mostly the reason was that spell
checkers used US English, and we are Aussies :P
Regards, Bob Devries
Dalby, QLD, Australia
On 11/11/2014 11:51 PM, farna at amc-mag.com wrote:
> Nobody has mentioned Tandy's "Deskmate"!!??? I know it wasn't the best,
> used too much memory, but it was an OS-9 based office suite. I think VIP
> was the best, but I never really used it. My two main productivity
> programs were Telewriter for word processing (TW64 and the later CC3
> version... tw128) and Ultimaterm for my terminal program. I used a
> checkbook program from The Rainbow at first, later one that I wrote for
> the CC3. Never did anything with graphics on the CoCo, and never needed a
> spreadsheet. I did use a mailing lable program, but can't remember what it
> was. Even after I got a PC for producing "the world of 68' micros" and my
> CoCo books, I did most of my initial writing on the CoCo, and used it for
> the Internet and e-mail until graphical pages took over the Internet to
> the point a text based browser wasn't practical. "Tandy's Little Wonder",
> the text for "Mastering OS-9", and even my first Rambler (car) book were
> all initially written on the CoCo. I'd transfer the text to the PC to
> layout pages in PageMaker and just do the final editing there. PM had a
> built-in spell checker, so that was easier to do on the PC. Graphics on
> the CoCo just wasn't good enough to print anything remotely professional
> looking, though I'm sure some will disagree. Even a 300 dpi laser printer
> was better than anything I ever got out of the CoCo. There were a couple
> DTP programs suitable for club or family newsletters, but I needed
> something better.
>
>
More information about the Coco
mailing list