[Coco] Ownership of NitOS-9
Nick Marentes
nickma2 at optusnet.com.au
Wed Nov 5 15:24:34 EST 2014
On 6/11/2014 5:54 AM, tim lindner wrote:
>
> What do you mean by polish?
Generalising... when an "outsider" looks at it, what is their perception
of it?
To use an example of what I have seen after spending a few hours leaning
about it...
Right from the get up and go, I 've run into problems regarding /d0 /sd0
(I'm using the SDC build). I was following the manuals starting at
chapter 1 and found that both /d0 and /sd0 access the same directories
and I was wondering why, after a few directory reads, I kept getting
ERROR #247 and couldn't read any drive.
I have since learned that I should only be using /sd0 (an LBA device)
and that /d0 should not have even read the /sd0 device.
This is using the SDC build of NitOS-9 and is a problem of a "bug" in
this version and a lack of documentation.
I also tried to edit the startup file because I couldn't stand looking
at that glaring green screen so I tried to edit it using the standard
editor supplied. In summary, ED should have been retired long ago.
I have since learned there are other editors like SCRED, so why hasn't
NitrOS-9 adopted a better editor? Does anyone use ED?
It also needs a standard tool for confuring and building new boot files.
Not everyone is a "rocket scientist".
And why is there no standardized installer process for people who just
want to "get on with the job"? Copying files to their respective
folders? That's error prone and potentially frustrating just to run an
application, especially for a non-expert.
A bit of "polish" would do a lot for how it's perceived to anyone
interested in learning about NitrOS-9.
Nick
More information about the Coco
mailing list