[Coco] 384 or 450 scanlines ?
Ciaran Anscomb
cocomalt at 6809.org.uk
Fri Jan 10 02:40:35 EST 2014
Nick Marentes wrote:
>
> Maybe the terms "Interlaced" and "Progressive" are more appropriate that
> don't reference the actual resolution but the way the scanlines are layed
> out to fill the vertical resolution of the display?
>
> The CoCo can't do progressive.
I see it as only doing progressive - half resolution, double rate (50Hz or
60Hz) progressive. The machines never actually *emit* that blank field you
describe, the lines for it are just never scanned.
..ciaran
More information about the Coco
mailing list