[Coco] What do people want?

[Allen Huffman]

> On Dec 17, 2014, at 12:21 PM, Gene Heskett <gheskett at wdtv.com> wrote:
> 
> I think the math and the i/o requirements of the 16550 preclude its us on 
> the coco because one would, due to its number of registers, need $10 bytes 
> of i/o space, which the coco-3 is extremely limited on.

Rick Uland's Fast232 pak he sold was based on the 16550. Maybe someone wants to track him down and see if they can make them again?

		-- A